NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Landroval]

It's evolutionarily advantageous in tribal societies where the men are sent to war and conquest without ill effect to organizational superstructure caused by death, etc

[Botten]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ItÂ’s super special when they graduate because they had literally everything except their own culture working against them to do so

This is how leftists think

Conservative news outlets have taken aim at the celebrations in recent weeks, in much the same way they have targeted identity-based housing in recent years. Campus Reform, a right-wing online publication group has push this agenda using Fox News and The Daily Mail.

It is important to note that these separate celebrations are nothing new and have been rooted in culture concerns in the past. For example California State University, Northridge, has been providing Black graduation celebration since 1972.

“Segregated graduation ceremonies exemplify how leftist ideas such as Critical Race Theory or Queer Theory construct artificial binaries to divide students into ‘us’ and ‘them,’” Campus Reform editor in chief Zachary Marschall.

But the real focus of the attack has been the reoccurring theme to excite the core values of the conservative voter base after the dwindling confidence resulting from the presidential election. A student dressing differently from their gender during college and university graduating ceremonies more over seems to be the outrage.

As these attacks get more vicious in nature some institutions have also increased the number of affinity graduations they offer, in many cases adding special ceremonies for LGBTQ+ students (often referred to as a lavender graduation).

Having separate celebrations for black communities has never been an issue for most attending conservative party members attending their child's graduation. But as the agenda pushes forward eliminating LGBTQ+ is the emphasis on this conservative political crusade.


... AKA conservative politicians need GOP voters to get organized and motivated push this issue it is an affront to the traditional Christian values.
This is sad since the consulting echo chamber by right entertainers are getting paid to push this filth and then while they are at it to make some grifting cash on the side by selling some phone plans. I can't believe people like Baler fall for this.

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Polygyny. Multiple gynies.

Good dog. Dog knows

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's evolutionarily advantageous in tribal societies where the men are sent to war and conquest without ill effect to organizational superstructure caused by death, etc

Interesting, but I highly doubt black communities are harkening back to their ancient cultures with their high rates of single parent households

It’s more a fun, convenience thing for the men, and a monetary (married = less gov’t benefits) thing for the women

To me anyway, if I had to argue why it’s done. It’s undeniably harder on the single female parent of multiple kids, so if there wasn’t a monetary benefit, it would be harder for others to justify doing it

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Conservative news outlets have taken aim at the celebrations in recent weeks, in much the same way they have targeted identity-based housing in recent years. Campus Reform, a right-wing online publication group has push this agenda using Fox News and The Daily Mail.

It is important to note that these separate celebrations are nothing new and have been rooted in culture concerns in the past. For example California State University, Northridge, has been providing Black graduation celebration since 1972.

“Segregated graduation ceremonies exemplify how leftist ideas such as Critical Race Theory or Queer Theory construct artificial binaries to divide students into ‘us’ and ‘them,’” Campus Reform editor in chief Zachary Marschall.

But the real focus of the attack has been the reoccurring theme to excite the core values of the conservative voter base after the dwindling confidence resulting from the presidential election. A student dressing differently from their gender during college and university graduating ceremonies more over seems to be the outrage.

As these attack get more vicious in nature some institutions have also increased the number of affinity graduations they offer, in many cases adding special ceremonies for LGBTQ+ students (often referred to as a lavender graduation).

Having separate celebrations for black communities has never been an issue for most attending conservative party members attending their child's graduation. But as the agenda pushes forward eliminating LGBTQ+ is the emphasis on this conservative political crusade.


... AKA conservative politicians need GOP voters to get organized and motivated push this issue it is an affront to the traditional Christian values.
This is sad since the consulting echo chamber by right entertainers are getting paid to push this filth and then while they are at it to make some grifting cash on the side by selling some phone plans. I can't believe people like Baler fall for this.

I don’t care if colleges want to bring segregation back, personally I think most of society even independents see it as a bad look for them

Don’t see what Christianity has to do with it. “Then Moses said “thou shalt not separate thy races”

[Landroval]

It's counterpart; familial banding, primarily arose out of northern cultures, with geographic displacement from polygynial epicenters, which is why the further you get from Africa, historically, the higher prominence nuclear family has, which primarily originates with Abrahamic/Brahmic cultures. Asia, being the furthest geographically situated locus within the old world, places a considerable emphasis on filial piety, subsequently

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good dog. Dog knows

Polyandry in the West. 🤭

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's counterpart; familial banding, primarily arose out of northern cultures, with geographic displacement from polygynial epicenters, which is why the further you get from Africa, historically, the higher prominence nuclear family has, which primarily originates with Abrahamic/Brahmic cultures. Asia, being the furthest geographically situated locus within the old world, places a considerable emphasis on filial piety, subsequently

Doesn’t explain why black families in America up until a particular point of time in history had much better rates of married nuclear households though. I’m just unfamiliar with when this shifted to the 70%+ single parent that now exists

[Landroval]

Contrary to polygynial superstructures, which emphasizes K-selection, filial superstructures are more skewed towards R-selection and favor wealth-conservation with said societies having legal measures in place for conserving the concept of heirs and inheritances

[Origen]

I don't have any issues with polygamy as long as everyone is a consenting adult. I was raised in a fairly boring nuclear family myself, which has since shattered and scattered.

I'm always skeptical when I see anyone claiming that this or that structure of a family is "right" or "wrong", we've all heard that phrase "It takes a village to raise a child" for a reason, despite the fact that most of us probably were not raised in something at the scale of a village.

Marxists argue that the nuclear family performs ideological functions for Capitalism – the family acts as a unit of consumption and teaches passive acceptance of hierarchy. It is also the institution through which the wealthy pass down their private property to their children, thus reproducing class inequality.