![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
John Bolton posts cryptic message implying Trump's White House trying to silence him.
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton has made a dramatic return to Twitter following his unexplained hiatus since his resignation in September, saying the White House blocked access to his personal account and suggested they are fearful of what he might say. Bolton appeared to hit back later in the day, writing: "We have now liberated the Twitter account, previously suppressed unfairly in the aftermath of my resignation as National Security Advisor. More to come....." | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
What happened? At one point you guys were touting how independents were nuts to impeach Trump. Oops again.
Maybe spend more time not worshipping and enabling big time liberals like these- https://m.imgur.com/AbeiR7w They still celebrate this on the left. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
"YOU should care deeply about Syria and our proxy wars. Ukraine is our greatest ally! Americans should die for our allies no question! They do so much for us!" It's like these boomer liberals who opposed Vietnam now are so anti-Trump that the moment Trump pushes out a warhawk or attempts to pull out of a place like Syria, they LOSE their collective mind and say, "Oh wow Bolton! Now there's a great true patriot! Shame on Trump for wanting to abandon our allies! JB knows best!" sheeesh.
__________________
Merimac 60 Warrior | Merrius 60 Mage |Ketheryn 60 Druid | Amory 60 Enchanter | Merrian 59 Bard
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
No one should ever lose sight that one side here tried to use American tax payer dollars to get a foreign prosecutor fired so their son could be the board member on a corrupt energy company set to earn aid. The other side simply asked this to be looked into. Pretty easy to see which side is supporting America in this equation and which isn’t.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
The funniest thing about all this is that the prosecutor that the US/EU wanted fired was refusing to cooperate with the UK authorities in a money laundering investigation of Burisma and its owner, which is why they wanted this prosecutor fired.
Democratic talking heads are so afraid of saying anything at all about Biden/Ukraine other than it's a hoax (sound familiar?) or that it's been debunked that they don't give any details/facts on the matter and trust that people can come to that conclusion on their own. Politician's have absolutely no faith in the public's intelligence (though, reading this thread is probably good example of why they shouldn't--on either side) and are so afraid to say anything that can be used as a sound bite in a 15 second political ad put out by the opposition that they refuse to acknowledge what is plainly obvious: Hunter Biden has been exploiting his father's position and family name for profit throughout his entire career. Is it illegal? No. Is it unethical? Yes. Does it have anything to do with Joe Biden? Not really. NYT article from 2015 that is often referenced regarding this NPR interview with Jame's Risen (the author of that article) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Sean Hannity’s Fiona Hill monologue didn’t feature a single word from Fiona Hill.
But if you simply tuned in to learn about the hearing, you didn’t hear a single word of what Hill actually had to say. Instead, viewers watched him dismiss Hill, who has appeared on Fox News as a foreign policy expert, as merely a “so-called Ukraine expert.” He then mocked her for not taking seriously the conspiracy theories she dismissed during her testimony as “fictional narratives that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves.” | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|