![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Are you happy with an 8 level pvp range | |||
| Yes |
|
75 | 41.44% |
| No (Post your suggested level difference) |
|
106 | 58.56% |
| Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Rogean has said he's for sure not including item loot.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
lol, ya that is true for the most part sparkle but there are hardcore pvpers that aren't huge douches. i think most the d bags came from rz. they tried to be relevant on zek too.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
I think +/-8 is important for level 40+ content. It's not about ensuring that the fight is always fair, it's about ensuring that you can always PvP against people who show up to compete for content that matches their level. There's plenty of content that matches a span of more than 5-6 levels. You could have a few level 42-43 players camping frenzied ghoul, for instance. Being unable to PvP for that camp would suck. Meanwhile, making dungeons FFA is difficult because you can typically begin going there in your mid-30s but won't be competing for any content wanted by the high-levels. A level 36 paladin soloing the lguk entrance shouldn't be attackable by every level 50 who zones in. 8 levels is about right for the purpose of content competition, anything less will guarantee stifled PvP some of the time. This will be especially important since KSing is legal.
| ||
|
Last edited by Bockscar; 10-13-2011 at 10:08 PM..
|
|
||
|
#5
|
|||
|
6-50 or you wear panties.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
can we not have a few FFA zones?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
It's not worth shaping the ruleset around the three people who will have deleveled twinks. Hell, practically none of the PvP gear is no-drop until Velious.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
take out lvl range period. SZ shall live again!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Not sure if i'm 100% here. But I recall something different back in the day.
VZ - TZ was +/- 8 lvls with teams Sullon Zek was no lvl cap pvp with diety Rallos Zek was +/- 4 lvls FFA with item loot. This is what i recall, but I could be wrong. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Mostly correct. SZ also had full, rezzable, xp loss on death if the person who killed you was +/- 5 levels, and had a 20% xp boost to compensate.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|