Why did I die?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I lost the debate by knowing there is a fallen to the ground message?

/boggle

You didn't know about the message being unreliable, and about using /con. The only person defending themselves in this thread is yourself. It's your typical pattern to troll people instead of admitting you were wrong. You are so angry you changed your signature.

There was never a debate about me not knowing about the message. I admitted to it on page one lol. Sadly your trolling isn't even good. Unlike yourself, I am able to admit when I am wrong, and learn new things.

Gloomlord continues to post nonsense. He still can't tell us when he posted something normal lol. He just logs in to troll and spam threads. Over 80% of all his posts look just like the last one.

[Gloomlord]

Do you actually think what you just said makes any sense...? A person reading this right now can simply go back to the beginning of the thread and know you're completely full of shit.

Edit: Stop the stealth edits, you idiot.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you actually think what you just said makes any sense...? A person reading this right now can simply go back to the beginning of the thread and know you're completely full of shit.

This is me admitting to not knowing about the message on page one:

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Interesting! I never noticed that actually. Looking over a few years worth of logs going back to 2019, I've only gotten this message 69 times on my SK. They all indeed seem to occur during a failed FD. I am a bit surprised if I have only failed FD 69 times in 4 years worth of logs.

I need to look deeper into my logs and see if there are any failed FD's without that message. Perhaps the message only shows up if you are close to other mobs? It's just a wild guess though.

There was never any debate about it. Either you can't read, are trolling, or both.

With regards to your trolling patterns, people can look at your post history. It's basically all trolling and spamming.

[Troxx]

Nobody else uses /con. Lol … this is just your overly complicated work around for not understanding a basic mechanic of the game. The message is fully reliable. Turn off autoattack and flop. Unless you fall to the ground it works and really is only broken from there if a mob was casting a spell on you before you flopped.

I didn’t think it was possible but you have managed to look significantly more foolish in this thread than we typically expect of you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nobody else uses /con. Lol … this is just your overly complicated work around for not understanding a basic mechanic of the game. The message is fully reliable. Turn off autoattack and flop. Unless you fall to the ground it works and really is only broken from there if a mob was casting a spell on you before you flopped.

I didn’t think it was possible but you have managed to look significantly more foolish in this thread than we typically expect of you.

As you can see, Troxx cannot admit he didn't know about /con, and has to pretend it's because nobody uses it. He has no evidence to back this up.

He also didn't know about the scenarios where the message doesn't show up.

His signature shows how embarassed he is.

[Troxx]

Sequence of events:

-dude asks why his FD failed
-DSM states flatly that there is no fail message for FD
-community laughs and points out he is wrong
-DSM does mental cartwheels to save face and “prove” that he was doing it correctly the entire time and that the message isn’t reliable … that message he didn’t even fucking know existed.


This is hilarious.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sequence of events:

-community laughs and points out he is wrong
-DSM does mental cartwheels to save face and “prove” that he was doing it correctly the entire time and that the message isn’t reliable … that message he didn’t even fucking know existed.


This is hilarious.

People can read the thread and see this is false. They can read your signature and see you are an angry troll.

Please admit you are wrong for once and stop spamming threads.

[Gloomlord]

You said there was no fail message. Someone pointed out you were completely wrong. You tried to damage control by saying it's really rare. People continued to point out how player error can also result in a failed FD, which is separate issue to the FD having an innate chance of just failing naturally.

You proved you were completely ignorant of this, and yet you still barged into the thread to prove you were an EQ expert. This is why we find you utterly insufferable, DSM. It's not because we're trolls -- it's that you're an arrogant individual who can't even give newbies correct information.

How do you even find this funny, Troxx?!

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said there was no fail message. Someone pointed out you were completely wrong. You tried to damage control by saying it's really rare. People continued to point out how player error can also result in a failed FD, which is separate issue to the FD having an innate chance of just failing naturally.

You proved you were completely ignorant of this, and yet you still barged into the thread to prove you were an EQ expert. This is why we find you utterly insufferable, DSM. It's not because we're trolls -- it's that you're an arrogant individual who can't even give newbies correct information.

How do you even find this funny, Troxx?!

Yes, I "damage controlled" by admitting I was wrong https://project1999.com/forums/showp...71&postcount=6 . The mental gymnastics here are astounding.

The debate in this thread was about the message's reliability, frequency, and ways to check if FD failed. Troxx lost that debate so badly he changed his signature.

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, I "damage controlled" by admitting I was wrong https://project1999.com/forums/showp...71&postcount=6 . The mental gymnastics here are astounding.

The debate in this thread was about the message's reliability, frequency, and ways to check if FD failed. Troxx lost that debate so badly he changed his signature.

You damage controlled by saying that it was really rare and that it barely occurred in the logs, but you didn't even know about it to begin with -- thus proving you really need to think before you speak, and that you really aren't as knowledgeable about this game as you think you are.

We wouldn't have given you such a hard time about it if it weren't for the fact you keep doing this over and over again across the forums.

You can't be trusted. Do you not understand that?