Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2019, 04:49 PM
Iksar_with_a_plan Iksar_with_a_plan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radbeard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I made a spreadsheet to compare things like this. Dual jade-maces are basically equal at lvl 49 to a woodsmans. I have some trouble comparing 2handers to 1handers only because this: http://lucy.allakhazam.com/dmgbonus.html is the table i've used for 2hander bonus damage. If thats accurate then so is what I just said.

However if you have a frostbringer + jade mace they achieve parity at lvl 40. Woodsman is basically BiS from lvls 30-40 without spending insanes amount of money, but is not economical after that. So I agree, 4k for 10 levels seems a bit too steep. A more reasonable value would probably be like 3k. There is certainly some value in being best in slot for ten levels.
Interesting...

Could you maybe compare woodsman at 30-40 to duel wield twink weapons? maybe 12/20 hammer and 13/23 winter's fury? or 10/18 and 12/21 velium weapons? or even SoZ 11/18 and Edge of Nightwalker 14/25 ?
  #2  
Old 01-24-2019, 05:01 PM
radbeard radbeard is offline
Sarnak

radbeard's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iksar_with_a_plan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Interesting...

Could you maybe compare woodsman at 30-40 to duel wield twink weapons? maybe 12/20 hammer and 13/23 winter's fury? or 10/18 and 12/21 velium weapons? or even SoZ 11/18 and Edge of Nightwalker 14/25 ?
That is a little bit of a pain to do because thats a lot of permutations, but i'll compare as though you were dual wielding a 12/20+14/25 at 31 and 40

Woodsmans vs 12/20 + 14/25 at 31: Woodsmans is ~2% better
Woodsmans vs 12/20 + 14/25 at 40: Woodsmans is ~6% worse
Woodsmans vs 12/20 + 14/25 at 49: Woodsmans is ~9% worse (this is assuming 200 weaponskill & dual wield skill)

Above level 50 the website I use assumes some pretty enormous bonus damage applied to 2handers and I suspect that isn't implemented on p99. My guess is that its basically accurate 1-50 and not accurate 51-60 (where for example it suggests the bonus damage on woodsman grows from 11 to 31). So thats the caveat. If anybody knows for sure wha the 2hander bonus damage table is like on P99 i'd love to see it.
  #3  
Old 01-24-2019, 05:39 PM
Iksar_with_a_plan Iksar_with_a_plan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radbeard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That is a little bit of a pain to do because thats a lot of permutations, but i'll compare as though you were dual wielding a 12/20+14/25 at 31 and 40

Woodsmans vs 12/20 + 14/25 at 31: Woodsmans is ~2% better
Woodsmans vs 12/20 + 14/25 at 40: Woodsmans is ~6% worse
Woodsmans vs 12/20 + 14/25 at 49: Woodsmans is ~9% worse (this is assuming 200 weaponskill & dual wield skill)

Above level 50 the website I use assumes some pretty enormous bonus damage applied to 2handers and I suspect that isn't implemented on p99. My guess is that its basically accurate 1-50 and not accurate 51-60 (where for example it suggests the bonus damage on woodsman grows from 11 to 31). So thats the caveat. If anybody knows for sure wha the 2hander bonus damage table is like on P99 i'd love to see it.
This is interesting man... thanks...

It's pretty much common knowledge to anyone who's researched the "what weapons should my ranger" use question that woodsman's staff is a must have at some point during leveling for its superior damage compared to DWing due to limited dmg bonus and duel wield skill caps. but its nice to have the comparisons (if they are in fact atleast close to being right) to show if I might still be reaching even with top notch 1 handers at those levels.

So... I understand its value as a weapon in those specific circumstances. But as it rises in price and gets closer to the average value of say an exquisite velium (insert 2 handed weapon here), i think it begins to reach what i'd consider being overpriced. If I could buy an exquisite velium claidhmore for 5k, or a woodsmans staff for 4k, i'd personally go with the velium weapon for its very slightly better ratio, its graphic and the fact that I would rather train in slashing than blunt. I wonder how a 32/36 compares to a 31/35, im sure the difference is negligible, but as I said i'd prefer an exquisite velium backscratcher to the staff.
  #4  
Old 01-24-2019, 07:54 PM
deezy deezy is offline
Sarnak

deezy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radbeard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If anybody knows for sure wha the 2hander bonus damage table is like on P99 i'd love to see it.
Currently bonus damage on a 2-hander is exactly the same as a 1-hander in the primary hand. However, in a future patch (same patch as monk triple attack, etc.), 2-hander bonus damage will scale with delay. There are a few sweet spots on the table that get bonus damage spikes. But for the most part it scales relatively evenly.
  #5  
Old 01-24-2019, 11:49 AM
zaneosak zaneosak is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 995
Default

CoS.... but I am bias because I really want one. My main is a 58 cleric with like 10k in the bank. I made a necro and have gotten him to 54 with mostly charm leveling after 35 and have no CoS. It's doable but annoying and would love one, but I aint got that kind of plat to spend. Lol~
  #6  
Old 01-24-2019, 07:48 PM
deezy deezy is offline
Sarnak

deezy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 464
Default

I made parses from several years ago of a woodsman's staff vs a lammy + some forgettable offhand. The parse showed virtually no difference in dps at level 40.

Fortunately, a friend of mine is leveling a ranger. I'm going to buy them a woodsman's staff and collect parses from them to get some comparisons.
  #7  
Old 01-26-2019, 12:18 PM
Quizlop Quizlop is offline
Kobold

Quizlop's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: qey2hh1
Posts: 139
Default

I just noticed that A Mithril Two-Handed Sword is definitely not worth the prices that people are asking for it.
__________________
  #8  
Old 01-26-2019, 12:33 PM
Crede Crede is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quizlop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just noticed that A Mithril Two-Handed Sword is definitely not worth the prices that people are asking for it.
Legit pet weapon
  #9  
Old 01-27-2019, 10:00 PM
Cen Cen is offline
Planar Protector

Cen's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,235
Default

Is there a way the wiki can be fixed so prices aren't displayed this way? Like if one person sells an item, it only shows their latest price? I saw someone wanting 1k for this robe because of one prankster.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #10  
Old 01-28-2019, 01:32 AM
Swish2 Swish2 is offline
Planar Protector

Swish2's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Is there a way the wiki can be fixed so prices aren't displayed this way? Like if one person sells an item, it only shows their latest price? I saw someone wanting 1k for this robe because of one prankster.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fat cats manipulating prices, shits_classic.gif :/
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.