Is Ted Cruz a RHINO?

[iruinedyourday]

a social conservative is only interested in telling individuals how to act and live... it has NOTHING to do with anything else.

You want people to act a certain way... just like all idiot republicans, you think the government CAN make people act a certain way, but the truth is it cannot.

So stop trying to pretend like you are after life liberty and freedom, when really a social conservative wants to limit ALL of those things, to make people less gay and less black and more fucking victorian.

You know who are socially conservative? ISIS is fucking socially conservative. So is every other authoritarian dictatorship

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah he's a lib, that's no secret, we debate it, not too meanly as like RnF grade, I don't hate him for his views. But what, a lib doesn't know what a conservative is? Geez we're usually total opposite of the issue, I think that'd be one way to know it.

As a conservative, I don't just care for conservatives, I care for all my fellow countrymen. I don't want to imprison them or destroy them, don't want them forever banned from forums or unable to voice their opinions. I more challenge them to check the facts, appeal to logic, observe the trends, and drop some pointed remarks to flush out their real opinions or core reasons behind their ideas.

Whatever ideal you espouse on these boards is useless if it's not backed up by your actions. Supporting Trump over a strict constitutionalist conservative tells me and everyone else you don't believe what you preach.

You made the list though /clap

Top 10 Phony conservatives
Bill O'Reilly
Anne Coulter
Sarah Palin
Donald Trump
Stephen K. Bannon
Sean Hannity
Tom Sullivan
Michael Savage
Matt Drudge
Daywolf

[Pokesan]

hey IRYD would you hatefuck ann coulter? i sure would

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Blitzers dementia

Bill O'Reilly
Anne Coulter
Sarah Palin
Donald Trump
Stephen K. Bannon (who?)
Sean Hannity
Tom Sullivan (who?)
Michael Savage (why you hating, because he's jew?)
Matt Drudge
Daywolf FTW! Red White and Blue!

Your list:
Glenn Beck Monday
Glenn Beck Tuesday
Glenn Beck Wednesday
Glenn Beck Thursday
Glenn Beck Friday
Glenn Beck Saturday
Book of Mormon Sunday (or is that Saturday, no idea what day Beck puts on his special underwear).

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your list:
Glenn Beck Monday
Glenn Beck Tuesday
Glenn Beck Wednesday
Glenn Beck Thursday
Glenn Beck Friday
Glenn Beck Saturday
Book of Mormon Sunday (or is that Saturday, no idea what day Beck puts on his special underwear).

Dunno what your obsession with Glenn Beck is he has ZERO influence on me. My study is based on the works of Milton Friedman and the "Great One" Mark Levin

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

a social conservative is only interested in telling individuals how to act and live... it has NOTHING to do with anything else.

You want people to act a certain way... just like all idiot republicans, you think the government CAN make people act a certain way, but the truth is it cannot.

So stop trying to pretend like you are after life liberty and freedom, when really a social conservative wants to limit ALL of those things, to make people less gay and less black and more fucking victorian.

You know who are socially conservative? ISIS is fucking socially conservative. So is every other authoritarian dictatorship

Your right I am socially conservative in my own life, but I am libertarian when it comes to everyone else's life. whatever you wanna do with your life is your call not mine. ISLAM is a cult, ISIS is just the enforcement wing of that cult. IRYD I definitely don't want to rule your life. What you Liberals don't understand is that your Rights End where others Begin that's the flaw in modern liberalism. That's where you become the Authoritarian dictator. I know you love Bernie "the democrat socialist".

IRYD what have you done, what makes you so special, what is so spectacular about your existence that you believe the wealth of others should be distributed to you?

Why are YOU entitled to OPM, (other people's money?)

[Pokesan]

oh, are we doing taxation = theft again? just making sure im on the right page for the scene

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

a social conservative is only interested in telling individuals how to act and live... it has NOTHING to do with anything else.

You want people to act a certain way... just like all idiot republicans, you think the government CAN make people act a certain way, but the truth is it cannot.

So stop trying to pretend like you are after life liberty and freedom, when really a social conservative wants to limit ALL of those things, to make people less gay and less black and more fucking victorian.

You know who are socially conservative? ISIS is fucking socially conservative. So is every other authoritarian dictatorship

Oh you're talking to me?? haaah. Or more like down at me, whatever ..or down to somewhere somthng. You should try reciting that load of BS while looking into a mirror, IRYD.

This is why I fondly like to say "Republicrats". You get Republicans and Democrats accusing each-other of the things they are both doing together. It's a really ridiculous phenomenon, and it's like they are completely blind to what they are actually saying and doing, themselves.

All that stuff should be battled at the state level, not federal level. I'm sure a many social conservatives and neocons would simply say I'm not socially conservative at all. But the matter for me is simply it takes big government to do such things, which imo cuts into fiscal conservatism, and more importantly the constitution. It's imo really hard to be both, very, not were it for social libertarianism which makes more for a smart balance as many have been realizing as of late.

IRYD's argument comes down to the battle of the nanny state, which will control it. I say neither, it simply should not exist. But IRYD is a woman of boxes, and the box is what is spoken to, not the individual. And that can be frustrating in a world-view of becoming boxes, all marching in a line, made of metal and gears.

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fiscally for sure. Socially, I like the conservative - libertarian split. Primarily regarding state rights. I don't care for intrusive federalism. But in whatever regards, I'm a constitutionalist first.

And speaking of that, it's funny how Blitzers keeps crying about Donald and the constitution, obviously parroting things he heard w/o actually thinking about it. Things like restoring our borders (we have none now) and getting rid of 0bamacare are downright serious constitutional issues for any constitutionalist, and those are two major issues of Donald's campaign (among other constitutional issues).

Poor Blitzers has become so brainwashed by lyin' Ted the I didn't know I was a Canadian citizen woops! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Took him over 40yrs to bother denouncing his Canadian citizenship, ay! How could Ted not know until 18 months ago?? Rlly?? The Dems are going to pick that apart with a vengeance.

He would have made a good VP, but he blew that. Cruz has turned his campaign into a twisted mess, it's sad, he's the one that "changed" (which Donald was referring to change in approach with his campaign when he said he could change). He's even full in with that Photographer who lied, outright lied, saying she was "thrown to the ground" of which they have video with it never happening, proven!

Like I've said in threads around here, you gotta watch what they do during their campaign. These guys are going to be interacting with world leaders! How is it going to fly when Ted starts making wild accusations up about world leaders, promoting accusations proven to be slanderous lies? The guy has sank too low, it's over for him.

Daywolf could never be a conservative because he has a double standard. He claims Ted Cruz is a low life and he can't vote for him because of that reasoning, yet Daywolf has thrown his support behind the Nation's raunchiest 2 faced liar of all time in Presidential politics. This is exactly why Daywolf is a Fraud/hypocrite, this is exactly what the establishment GOP does, talk a good game during campaign season then screws you in D.C.

There is concrete evidence Cruz will secure the boarders, there's also proof he stopped the gang of 8 Amnesty bill. He is the only candidate that has promised to defund Sanctuary cities.

What I really think is going on is Daywolf has, much like Trump an inferiority complex. Daywolf must be the talking head at every local Bar who thinks his vast knowledge alone should be enough to win every argument. Unfortunately knowledge without wisdom is like a gun with no bullets. So Daywolf just keeps talking, it really doesn't matter what he says, because his goal isn't to inform anyone about truth, his goal is to feel superior by deflecting every argument into some obscure inconsequential fact he picked up while playing Trivial Pursuit or watching Jeopardy. He literally is the reincarnate of the No-Nothing Party and Trump is his Chief.

Oh yeah I forgot, this is also why Pokesan is his Lap dawg. Pokesan knows I stand behind my conservative beliefs and won't waiver, I frighten Pokesan. He knows that I would support secession, I would wage that War, and I would be merciless to the Progressives. He's attracted to you Daywolf because he knows he can relate to you on a depraved level much like the Trump. He knows you'll waiver, he knows your flawed and he's just waiting like a snake to take that bite.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dunno what your obsession with Glenn Beck is he has ZERO influence on me. My study is based on the works of Milton Friedman and the "Great One" Mark Levin

Lyin' Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't care who you listen/watch/follow, it's trash how you interpret it. All your interpretations are trash.

Your list is not my list though, just crossed out the ones I consider 0's. Only one on the list I do listen to once or twice a week is Hannity, from his radio program, not from Faux.

Levin == Savage. I've had too many disagreements to bother with Levin. At lest Savage, whom I often disagree with, is entertaining. Though been ages since I listened to him.

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your right I am socially conservative in my own life, but I am libertarian when it comes to everyone else's life. whatever you wanna do with your life is your call not mine. ISLAM is a cult, ISIS is just the enforcement wing of that cult. IRYD I definitely don't want to rule your life. What you Liberals don't understand is that your Rights End where others Begin that's the flaw in modern liberalism. That's where you become the Authoritarian dictator. I know you love Bernie "the democrat socialist".

IRYD what have you done, what makes you so special, what is so spectacular about your existence that you believe the wealth of others should be distributed to you?

Why are YOU entitled to OPM, (other people's money?)

But you can't ask that, not after saying "whatever you wanna do with your life is your call not mine. " because that's what she want's to do with her life, man! Who are you then to say she can't? Just like all the Sanders people shouting down and stomping on Donald's freedom of speech claiming they have the freedom of speech to do that, to take his away. So be honest and just say no you can't.

In a civil society, you can't just do whatever you want. It's not just that states should be deciding their stance on say gay marriage, but that the feds should not be deciding on what marriage is in the first place and then trying to regulate it and tax it. If California votes it down (and they did), they should have that right if they want that outcome.

But this isn't about that, it's about who is going to control the big nanny state, and the difference between marriage and civil union is simply used as a sacrificial pawn. You're in the wrong camp, you're probably from the far extreme fringes of the libertarian party.