What drug is your favorite?

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by karsten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A few thoughts from your friendly neighborhood PALadin:

1. Anarchocapitalism is sorta internet trendy -- clearly one needs to be bright and think outside the bun to be a follower of it, but ehhhhh (this coming from a very proud libertarian)

2. Japan is owning most of you in this thread by using very few words. True internet JUDO

3. Man I have TWO degrees in Political Science. Just thought I'd mention that for supreme internet bragging rights.

Love,
Karsten

It is very internet trendy with people who want to appear rebellious and fringe. It is nothing more than a form of anarchy. Just like Bison's ideas on drugs, this has never been instituted anywhere in the world. You can argue that it has been practiced in a form in the past but it is not currently used anywhere. Why is that? And you do not need to be bright or think outside the bun to grasp it. It is all about the me ,me ,me mentality. Not surprising that most who believe in this are: social liberals, non-conformist, and atheist. Once again, if it is such a great idea, why is it not practiced anywhere? Are you saying that you are smarter than everyone else and they do not know how to institute the governments they have in their countries?

[karsten]

ohsnaps i think i just let myself get trolled

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by karsten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ohsnaps i think i just let myself get trolled

No, I think you trolled me...see I can do that too. Why is it trolling when you discuss something on a forum? Isn't that the reason people post things - to discuss an issue or topic? Then why is it that you accuse me of being a troll? Is it easier for your to call someone a name or accuse them of trolling, than it is to offer a retort? Does it make you feel like you "win" by dismissing someone or calling them a name? Whatever makes your e-peen grow I suppose. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[azeth]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I think you trolled me...see I can do that too. Why is it trolling when you discuss something on a forum? Isn't that the reason people post things - to discuss an issue or topic? Then why is it that you accuse me of being a troll?

You're not a troll because you're disagreeing with people. You're a troll because your points are so pedestrian that we can only assume you're trolling.

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're not a troll because you're disagreeing with people. You're a troll because your points are so pedestrian that we can only assume you're trolling.

Pedestrian how? Because you don't agree with them? Give me an example.

[azeth]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pedestrian how? Because you don't agree with them? Give me an example.

For me, it started where you compared heroine addicts to recreational pot users.

[M.Bison]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not surprising that most who believe in this are: social liberals, non-conformist, and atheist.

Social Liberals: Recognize the legitimacy of the state to provide services such as healthcare, unemployment, and education.
I find it hard to believe that someone who calls themselves a social liberal would align themselves with a group that recognizes no legitimacy for the state or any services it provides. These groups are in direct opposition with each other.

Non-Conformist: The refusal to conform.
Do I have to point out the subjectivity of this term? One can argue that Jesus was a non-conformist. Hitler could also be considered a non-conformist. George Washington is also a great example of what one could consider to be a non-conformist. On a smaller scale one could view a non-conformist as anyone who disagrees with them on a personal level. Following that line of thinking, you're a non-conformist.

Atheist - the rejection of belief in a deity.
I'm assuming this is supposed to be a bad thing somehow, although I fail to understand why.

Nice try.
Your attempts at trolling were unsuccessful.
You have gotten better at Trolling! (2)

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For me, it started where you compared heroine addicts to recreational pot users.

ITT: People without perspective associate heroine addicts with recreational drug users.
__________________

That was your quote, not mine. I never compared the two. Sorry.

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by M.Bison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Social Liberals: Recognize the legitimacy of the state to provide services such as healthcare, unemployment, and education.
I find it hard to believe that someone who calls themselves a social liberal would align themselves with a group that recognizes no legitimacy for the state or any services it provides. These groups are in direct opposition with each other.

Non-Conformist: The refusal to conform.
Do I have to point out the subjectivity of this term? One can argue that Jesus was a non-conformist. Hitler could also be considered a non-conformist. George Washington is also a great example of what one could consider to be a non-conformist. On a smaller scale one could view a non-conformist as anyone who disagrees with them on a personal level. Following that line of thinking, you're a non-conformist.

Atheist - the rejection of belief in a deity.
I'm assuming this is supposed to be a bad thing somehow, although I fail to understand why.

Nice try.
Your attempts at trolling were unsuccessful.
You have gotten better at Trolling! (2)

Social Liberals - Post-left anarchy is a recent current in anarchist thought that seeks to distance itself from the traditional Left (communism, social liberalism, social democracy, etc.) and to escape the confines of ideology in general. It has rapidly developed since the fall of the Soviet Union, which many view as the death of authoritarian leftism; however, its roots are clearly visible in the ideas of the 1960's Situationists. It is not an independent "movement" as such but rather a critical way of thinking about anarchist ideas. Post-leftists frequently use the word anarchy instead of anarchism to avoid the -ism suffix's connotations of doctrine.

Non-conformist - check.

Atheist - check.

You have almost gotten better at thinking (1/2)

[Dentalplan]

You guys are getting trolled so hard.