![]() |
|
#131
|
|||
|
If they were a lazy grad student copy pasting from stackoverflow they would not be our true creator but merely a demigod.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#132
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#133
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#134
|
|||
|
My approach to science is the correct way because I question everything and don't accept a fossil record with like 4 fossils of monkeys saying I am a monkey
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#135
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#136
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#137
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#138
|
|||
|
Additionally, we've identified the molecular solutions that microorganisms have developed to protect themselves against antibiotics. In some cases, general xenobiotic enzymes are mutated to accept these new molecules as substrates, allowing them to catalyze chemical reactions which inactivate the antibiotics by changing their molecular structures and interrupting their function as potent protein inhibitors. In other cases general efflux pumpes are mutated to remove the antibiotic from the cell, keeping it below the working concentration. In other cases, the protein targets of the antibiotics have mutated, and the antibiotic no longer properly inhibits them. In other cases, horizontal gene transfer appears to be the culprit. The vast majority of antibiotics are natural compounds or semi synthetic derivatives of natural compounds. The biosynthetic machinery of these compounds evolved as weapons factories in a molecular arms race between microbes competing for nutrients. The microbial host that produces the antibiotic has to have its own resistance mechanism, and the theft of the genetic code for this resistance (horizontal gene transfer) allows a previously susceptible organism to gain resistance.
All of these mechanisms are genetically encoded, and their appearance represents a chance in the genetic code which is subsequently heritable. That's fucking evolution. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#139
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also arguing over religion is probably one of the biggest wastes of time that I can imagine. It's utterly pointless to argue with people who only accept one world view as correct. Your insistence that there are other ways to look at life is an abrupt decay to their entire framework of existence - something so scary that they can only refute your points and cling to their fundamentalist views that insist upon the re-telling of thousands of years worth of stories conjured by earlier civilization to explain natural phenomena. I'm perfectly fine with saying 'i don't know - maybe you're right'. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#140
|
|||
|
Science hardly explains everything, but at least what it does explain is more or less indisputable (not talking about advanced physics, more like Newtonian).
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|