TMO or FE, which to choose?

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?

rogean provided info that proved the bet was actually won by mortiiss, albeit on a technicality

in reality he was pretty much trolling tiggles for making a fraudulent bet

either way, it has nothing to do with alarti being a known scammer to the community. as a member of his guild, your inaction must be assumed to mean you either share his lack of integrity or tacitly support it

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as a member of his guild, your inaction must be assumed to mean you either share his lack of integrity or tacitly support it

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed

Just because you don't have the mental facilities to discuss something rationally does not mean it can't be rationally discussed.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nerosys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Translation ...
You made a bet, got caught with your dick in your mouth and its taken you 3 weeks to come up with this piss poor excuse got it.

Incorrect.

[Hurley]

what a come back

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hurley [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what a come back

ditto?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rogean provided info that proved the bet was actually won by mortiiss, albeit on a technicality

in reality he was pretty much trolling tiggles for making a fraudulent bet

either way, it has nothing to do with alarti being a known scammer to the community. as a member of his guild, your inaction must be assumed to mean you either share his lack of integrity or tacitly support it

This is Rogean's Post. He clearly states that a bet has to be within a time limit. however it does not.

--------------------------------------------

You made that post at 8:41 PM.

The account was unbanned at 8:04 PM.

Putting aside the obvious inside information, your condition of the bet was "Holyspawn getting unbanned" effective at any point between 8:41 PM and 11:59 PM.

For this condition to be met, the account would have to be rebanned, and then unbanned again, which is highly unlikely.

So you will owe those people 100k each at midnight. I'll hold you to it.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sweet meme bro, super witty

you are the company you keep. your routine is bullshit, you're interested in fairness insofar as it doesn't impact your side of the aisle

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sweet meme bro, super witty

you are the company you keep. your routine is bullshit, you're interested in fairness insofar as it doesn't impact your side of the aisle

Are you seriously suggesting that I'm defending Alarti's bet welching? How does it even remotely look like that?

That was my second post on the subject. It was mostly a copy and paste of the first one (http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=132) from several weeks ago.

He's been dancing around with the whole "Rogean invalidation" deflection for weeks and no one bothered to ask exactly how it worked. No one bothered asking how it works, because it doesn't. I thought it was obvious that by asking for an explanation it'd very quickly become obvious that there wasn't one. I'm not seeing where you're getting that I'm defending him. I've stayed completely out of the matter aside from posting the same question twice.

We all know he straight up broke his word. I'm just not sure how you got the idea I was defending that when I'm pointedly asking that he explain something that has no excuse or logic behind it.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you seriously suggesting that I'm defending Alarti's bet welching? How does it even remotely look like that?

That was my second post on the subject. It was mostly a copy and paste of the first one (http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=132) from several weeks ago.

He's been dancing around with the whole "Rogean invalidation" deflection for weeks and no one bothered to ask exactly how it worked. No one bothered asking how it works, because it doesn't. I thought it was obvious that by asking for an explanation it'd very quickly become obvious that there wasn't one. I'm not seeing where you're getting that I'm defending him. I've stayed completely out of the matter aside from posting the same question twice.

We all know he straight up broke his word. I'm just not sure how you got the idea I was defending that when I'm pointedly asking that he explain something that has no excuse or logic behind it.

now it doesn't look like that -- the above is fair. thank you.

the bolded sections are all that was necessary, but in their absence, it looked a lot like tacit approval. i believe you're the first from your guild to explicitly state the above

and your question about rogean seemed to me to be an implication that rogean had no authority to disregard the bet, not a genuine inquiry. i was mistaken