Impeaching President Trump

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Wwen42 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

GDP is not everything.

"wealth" is mostly an illusion.

i was gonna usenet reply you but you seem like a nice boy so here's the cool parts of your post.

[Kaveh]

Anyone seen “See” on Apple +? (I pirated it to my plex server, I don’t pay these jews for their streaming services)

Anyway, this show sucks ass. Can’t believe someone thought it was a good concept

[feniin]

I think what most liberals are missing is that this isn't about right and wrong, it's about winning and losing. I've attached my entire worldview to this man and I am going down with the ship. Not one of you is going to convince me otherwise.

[Wonkie]

Sideways thought: Is Chief Justice Roberts really gonna let his legacy be mass jury nullification on the part of the United States Senate?

[Kaveh]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sideways thought: Is Chief Justice Roberts really gonna let his legacy be mass jury nullification on the part of the United States Senate?

I’d vote for anyone who confiscated mark zuckerberg’s wealth and turns him into a human centipede along with the board of google

[feniin]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sideways thought: Is Chief Justice Roberts really gonna let his legacy be mass jury nullification on the part of the United States Senate?

Definitely.

[Kaveh]

Lots of republicans are snowflakes now

Strange world we live in, where the whites became the N’s

[feniin]

Is connecting dots not used by detectives anymore? Trump told Guiliani to handle it. That's your connection.

[Ripp]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is connecting dots not used by detectives anymore? Trump told Guiliani to handle it. That's your connection.

I know you don't realize this but, what he posted denies that. Here, let me (try to) help:



“Answer the question,” Turner said. “Is it correct no one on this planet told you that Donald Trump was tying this aid to the investigations?”

“Because if your answer is yes, then the chairman is wrong and the headline on CNN is wrong,” Turner said. “No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations, yes or no?”

“Yes,” Sondland said.

“So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withold aid from Ukraine in exchange for thee investigations?” Turner asked.

“Other than my own presumption,” Sondland said.



"Anyone on the planet" includes Giuliani.

Lul. I'm embarrassed for you.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by Ripp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know you don't realize this but, what he posted denies that. Here, let me (try to) help:



“Answer the question,” Turner said. “Is it correct no one on this planet told you that Donald Trump was tying this aid to the investigations?”

“Because if your answer is yes, then the chairman is wrong and the headline on CNN is wrong,” Turner said. “No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations, yes or no?”

“Yes,” Sondland said.

“So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withold aid from Ukraine in exchange for thee investigations?” Turner asked.

“Other than my own presumption,” Sondland said.



"Anyone on the planet" includes Giuliani.

Lul. I'm embarrassed for you.

Sondland testified that there was an explicit quid pro quo. “I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’ ” Sondland said. “As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.”