Trakanon feb 20 - Page 13

Nerosys · #**121** 02-21-2013, 04:32 PM

I find it funny that the person that Advocates training with no GM intervention is now crying that his guild lost Trak do to supposed trains not only crying but asking for raid suspensions.

Alarti0001 · #**122** 02-21-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurley [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"I want to make sure we err on the side of leniency in cases like this one. We will certainly show the same leniency toward you or any other guild" - Hobby, Dec 7th on FE's fraps of TMO kiting Sev as an "accident".

You post a gm response but not a fraps>? LOL

Alarti0001 · #**123** 02-21-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nerosys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I find it funny that the person that Advocates training with no GM intervention is now crying that his guild lost Trak do to supposed trains not only crying but asking for raid suspensions.

If the rules allowed training TMO would have been free to counter train or to train their engage. They don't.

This confuses you how?

Alarti0001 · #**124** 02-21-2013, 04:34 PM

[QUOTE=melkezidek;858765]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im confused... did this happen? Where is the proof. Until you have evidence its not related.

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...t=hate&page=26

This is the event I’m talking about. Way to much to look through for me atm. However I’m fairly certain that it was ruled as "accidental" and because TMO's puller was not experienced. However it was a while ago and I do admit I could very well be wrong.

I got through 12/19 pages did't see one screenshot/log/fraps.

Autotune · #**125** 02-21-2013, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nerosys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I find it funny that the person that Advocates training with no GM intervention is now crying that his guild lost Trak do to supposed trains not only crying but asking for raid suspensions.

You find it funny that I advocate training in the raid scene with no GM intervention and then also call for the GMs to raid suspend a guild because there is GM intervention currently for training in the raid scene (outside of VP)?

Tell you what, get your guild to agree to a train war with TMO in the raid scene like I suggested earlier. Oh, wait... nvm, your guild is full of cowards who want to hide behind rotations.

jkfranklin · #**126** 02-21-2013, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scowlie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe you should quit one of your three minimum wage jobs and go back to school so you can work on that reading comprehension.

falkun · #**127** 02-21-2013, 04:56 PM

@Stealin: If you want competition, go raid Red. Kill your competition, literally. Don't hide behind blue nameplates.

Autotune · #**128** 02-21-2013, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falkun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

@Stealin: If you want competition, go raid Red. Kill your competition, literally. Don't hide behind blue nameplates.

I quit when IB left and VD was proven to suck at raiding.

If I wanted competition, I'd do what I did. Red is in a worse state than blue when it comes to raiding competition.

falkun · #**129** 02-21-2013, 05:03 PM

Then take your guild full of people who "want competition" and go compete. Nihi is waiting there for you, on a server DESIGNED FOR competition. You won't have to track, there was/is an EXP bonus so you'll get 60 faster, you can literally beat your competition, and you can "test your mettle" perfecting your tactics again as the underdogs. Its a win/win/win/win for everything TMO states they are about, yet TMO maintains the blue nametags and then whines for "more competition".

jkfranklin · #**130** 02-21-2013, 05:06 PM

Get real....that fucking pussy bitch won't go to red.