Game Mechanics: T-staff proc in PvP

[Nirgon]

Smedy makes some very good comments here but let's just put this bad boy on hold until tested on EQ Mac.

[Nirgon]

EQMac is the way to go here given window and lack of changes to the spell, hoping I can have Avon get us some infos.

[SamwiseRed]

EQMac sounds good, I'd also like to see Searyx comment since he was a monk with a t-staff in classic.

[Tippett]

Pretty offensive that casters are in here bitching about t staff, I mean the fucked resists make all casters here beyond overpowered. Yet they bitch to get one of the few things that give melee a chance a nerf.

2/6 ROOTS AT 204 MR NEVER FORGET #bitchmadedruids

[Samrothstein]

Of course some people will bitch about both.

T-staff might need investigation.
Spell resists are completely jacked right now.

If you rely on root, you are a failure at PvP.

Nothing new here, stop arguing in bugs.

[Tippett]

Everyone relies on root to great success unfortunately

[Rettii]

Sadly I went full mana to oom casting root on Hughman at ~150 mr not sure if saying 2/6 at 200+ is srs, might be too much of a random numbers game. Not rly sure of root argument still viable.

[Nirgon]

Rooted 2/5 with 151mr against Larsen, who did con red... so there's that.

Despite claims of "no one tries to root any more" , it is frequently cast on me in fights.

I feel very bad for people who don't have jac rings, tcrown, gbs etc.

[Vayder]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rooted 2/5 with 151mr against Larsen, who did con red... so there's that.

In other news I flipped a coin 5 times and it came up heads 4 times, coin must be rigged!

[Rettii]

That's what I'm saying, I think it's the RNG part of roots that need looking at (if this is te case) but I just was adding to the argument tangent about melee getting rooted. This is tstaff thread carry on.