![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
reroll server with item loot / or reroll server with teams imho
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
priority #1: one time transfer from blue
lots of blue players are sick of the FTE rule and I think guilds as a whole would come over to red #2: YT, no hybrid penalty etc if #1+2 is not (at least partially) doable by the staff then #3: wipe it there is just one way or the other nilbog/rogean. please stop ignoring your red population!
__________________
Mitic<Transatlantic Nihilum> | ||
|
Last edited by mitic; 09-25-2012 at 07:27 AM..
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Get through all the fixes posted, take your time no rush (not trolling).
After everything is all patched up, see where we are with population and start taking some kind of serious community vote or an IRC pow-wow. It's true that it's not fair to the raiders to wipe a box. It's also not fair to people who paid blue stuff to get red stuff. But months down the road, we may be having a different talk. Things just got off on a real bad start. I'd say the only thing to pull it back together would be some kind of unanymous vote, special in game/forum titles handed out to the last people playing etc and a restart only if they all agreed on it. The unwashed masses really don't know what's good for them. They will be happiest with a fully classic RZ type server. Personally? Yes a 3,000 pop SZ style box would be fantastic but it's not a reality. | ||
|
Last edited by Nirgon; 09-25-2012 at 11:55 AM..
|
|
||
|
#5
|
|||
|
any update on this shit sirken??
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
compromise doesn't mean everybody is going to get everything they want. but i'm fairly certain there's a middle ground that will keep the server within the vision the staff has, while also ensuring the majority of the players will have even more fun playing on the server. as i said in a previous post, i'm busy, so i'm not going to respond to every post, or post every day. but i WILL read every post as time allows. thanks everyone for your continued patience, it's appreciated. <3 | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
So far so good with Sirken, it's been a while too. Hopefully he gets all the tools he needs to continue doing his thang.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
|
|
||||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Very important PVP change that is very easy that I always forget to complain about since beta.
/con to player should result in the following Red = player too high to engage Yellow = player higher than you but pvpable White = player exact same level as you Blue = player lower level than you but pvpable Green = player too low to pvp I never know who i can engage as it is. At least not right away. I don't look at mob names to see if they are in PVE range, why would it be different for players? For PVP I don't think light blue should be part of the procedure. Was light blue even classic? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
The whole range/in range thing..
It was very common on live for me to see a blue player and try to staff of temp flux them to test if they were in range. As far as when light blue was added as a con.. I don't know but it definitely didn't exist at launch. There were just green con npcs that would give xp (small amount) sometimes, later light blue came in. Not sure on a date. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|