Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Classic Resist System or Custom?
Classic Everquest Resists. 63 77.78%
Null's Custom Resists. 18 22.22%
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2012, 07:06 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

I can't wait.
  #2  
Old 08-29-2012, 08:32 PM
tokso tokso is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 25
Default

so if classic resist system is implemented, as an enchanter should I just gate after doing a couple dispels?
  #3  
Old 08-29-2012, 08:39 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

+

tashanian (-39 MR)

Most non-warrior classes running around w/ 80-120 MR unbuffed in resist gear == you can still land stuff

Mythd killed me on TZ using rapture-nuke-rapture-nuke-rapture-nuke. No root required. Rapture being the unresistable mez spell you get at 59. Think there's one in the low 50's too.

You also have charm spells.
  #4  
Old 08-29-2012, 10:59 PM
Vayder Vayder is offline
Sarnak

Vayder's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 306
Default

I still can't fathom that classic resists worked the way you folks have described. Not saying they didn't cause I wasn't playing pvp then but using the explanation and Lucy data the following would be true:

Immune to Ice Comet at 117cr
Immune to Lava Bolt at 107fr
Immune to Venom of the Snake at 96pr
Immune to Anarchy at 71mr

Was that classic? If not, then your appeal to Lucy is wrong.
__________________
  #5  
Old 08-29-2012, 11:07 PM
gloinz gloinz is offline
Planar Protector

gloinz's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,003
Default

can confirm cleric/enchanter nukes never landed not sure bout all that other stuff
__________________
Griefer of Greenie, 1999-2003
PvP Champ, 2003-2005
Senior Vice President, <PvP Champs> 2006-Present
  #6  
Old 08-29-2012, 11:47 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vayder [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I still can't fathom that classic resists worked the way you folks have described. Not saying they didn't cause I wasn't playing pvp then but using the explanation and Lucy data the following would be true:

Immune to Ice Comet at 117cr
Immune to Lava Bolt at 107fr
Immune to Venom of the Snake at 96pr
Immune to Anarchy at 71mr

Was that classic? If not, then your appeal to Lucy is wrong.
No. We are talking CC spells only. This does not apply to anything else.

Wizard and Druid nukes still hit me plenty on 120+ FR
  #7  
Old 08-30-2012, 09:18 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vayder [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I still can't fathom that classic resists worked the way you folks have described. Not saying they didn't cause I wasn't playing pvp then but using the explanation and Lucy data the following would be true:

Immune to Ice Comet at 117cr
Immune to Lava Bolt at 107fr
Immune to Venom of the Snake at 96pr
Immune to Anarchy at 71mr

Was that classic? If not, then your appeal to Lucy is wrong.
Unsure of where people started citing lucy for resist % rate, but just looking at this anyone who played classic knows this is hillariously wrong. 107/117 did not ever make you immune to non stun linked nukes. Unless you were a bard rolling around with resist songs you would rarely ever full resist a nuke (unless it was an enchanter/cleric nuke above level 20, furor and chaotic feedback (as well as shock of lightning with its knockback) seemed to be included in the normal resist nuke resist code).

just a quick FYI, not reading whole thread need to go out and hit up the bars pals.

And to morons who believe enchanters are bad in pvp if they can't land nukes... I'm too busy to type out an adequate insult to capture your extreme stupidity.
  #8  
Old 08-30-2012, 12:35 AM
Kief Kief is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SearyxTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
+

tashanian (-39 MR)

Most non-warrior classes running around w/ 80-120 MR unbuffed in resist gear == you can still land stuff

Mythd killed me on TZ using rapture-nuke-rapture-nuke-rapture-nuke. No root required. Rapture being the unresistable mez spell you get at 59. Think there's one in the low 50's too.

You also have charm spells.
Searyx you are from TZ. Mythd did not only mez and nuke, he would literally debuff you to the point of him being able to melee you to death. Tell me you remember this? These people claiming that with classic resists classes are effecitvely "gutted" is absolute down syndrome bull-shit. Classic resists allow actual pvp. Anyone saying different NEVER PLAYED CLASSIC - VELIOUS PVP. HELLO GYLEN GETTING OWNED BY AN ENCHANTER (before primal)....FUCKING RETARDS
  #9  
Old 09-21-2012, 07:26 PM
runlvlzero runlvlzero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a motherfucking awesome place.
Posts: 2,801
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamzal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What can cancel magic do that pumice cant? Sucked on live anyway maybe its OP here who knows. Please prove me wrong with just 1 example.
Nope you are right. I thought cancel magic was a good use of a spell gem until I learned the wonders of pumice. Also if you are trying to pumice off druid dots dont do it in LOS of their nukes ;p (they will kill you before u can finish pumicing)
Last edited by runlvlzero; 09-21-2012 at 07:40 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.