Best trio to self farm gear/dungeons

[Lampolo]

Saying the shaman can slow is not a logical argument. We alrdy know this. Having two showing classes is a waste of space in this trio. Having a free spell slot and extra mana for the enchanter does not equal more xp/hr. The enchanter can alrdy do their job in full without your help

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Saying the shaman can slow is not a logical argument. We alrdy know this. Having two showing classes is a waste of space in this trio. Having a free spell slot and extra mana for the enchanter does not equal more xp/hr. The enchanter can alrdy do their job in full without your help

You simply saying something isn't a logical argument... isn't a logical argument[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Under your logic the cleric is a waste of space because they share lulls/roots/stuns with the Enchanter. I guess you can't have two classes with similar spells lol. /sarcasm

If you have ever played an enchanter, you would know they are one of those classes that needs every spell slot they can get. They are also spending quite a bit of mana if they are actively playing.

And yes, an Enchanter can solo efficiently without a Cleric or a Shaman. That helps prove my point!

[Lampolo]

OK then let's go with your logic. We might as well have 2 tanks cause then they can mitigate more dmg. Your arguments only make sense to you or a new player. This is why I say stop giving advice. You can't make sense of anything

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OK then let's go with your logic. We might as well have 2 tanks cause then they can mitigate more dmg. Your arguments only make sense to you or a new player. This is why I say stop giving advice. You can't make sense of anything

I am not sure how you came to the conclusion that having two classes with slow is equal to having two tanks. You are really shooting yourself in the foot here.

You do know that people run trios with 2 Enchanters, right? That is literally a complete duplication of all spells (including slows!), but it still works great. Are you going to say that a trio with 2 Enchanters is bad? With your logic it is bad, because there are two classes with slow in the same trio.

[Lampolo]

Who said a trio with two showers is bad? You doing strawman again?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who said a trio with two showers is bad? You doing strawman again?

You did:

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Having two showing classes is a waste of space in this trio.

That is a pretty clear statement, and includes 2 Enchanters. They both have slow. Would you like to clarify?

[Lampolo]

It's not best xp trio moron. That's what I said

[Lampolo]

Do you drool?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you drool?

Thank you for admitting defeat. Please try again when you have a more salient argument than "two 'showing' classes are bad in a trio".

[Lampolo]

Sorry enchanters don't need shamans to slow. Hope you can recover some day