Probably time for a Kyle Rittenhouse thread.

[BlackBellamy]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In your capacity as a law professor, would you agree the use of deadly force to protect property would justify murder charges under Wisconsin law?

but he wasn't charged with anything to do with property
there isn't even such a crime
he was charged with first degree intentional homicide
and his defense didn't raise any property defenses
his defense is he shot those people because he needed to

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by BlackBellamy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but he wasn't charged with anything to do with property
there isn't even such a crime
he was charged with first degree intentional homicide
and his defense didn't raise any property defenses
his defense is he shot those people because he needed to

Same question to you, your Honor.

[myrddraal]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, because if they take your gun from you, they are now armed with your gun.

And people generally do not throw shit at a person with a gun, unless they are highly unstable and unpredictable.

Kyle literally did nothing wrong, there is no case against him.

Pretty sure thats not why he broke down like a bitch.

[Jibartik]

alpha male democrats.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by myrddraal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure thats not why he broke down like a bitch.

Maybe he did because shooting people takes an obvious mental toll, not to mention being the object of half the country's ire for the last year and a half.

Free and fair open question here: What would the rioter nutjobs had to have done in order for you to consider it justified for kyle to use his weapon in self defense?

I mean, it's already totally justified, but you obviously disagree. So, what *would* it take for you to say it was justified?

[Jibartik]

"why were you running at the fire? what was so urgent?"

"because it's a fire?"

"there's fires all over the place."

"I was going to the fire to put it out?"

"why would you think that you should go around and put out fires?"

lol I think this prosecutor is an alien he doesn't seem to understand our customs at all.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe he did because shooting people takes an obvious mental toll, not to mention being the object of half the country's ire for the last year and a half.

Free and fair open question here: What would the rioter nutjobs had to have done in order for you to consider it justified for kyle to use his weapon in self defense?

I mean, it's already totally justified, but you obviously disagree. So, what *would* it take for you to say it was justified?

Kyle a hero for puttin that antifa pedo scum in the ground

He deserves a medal for sure

[Jibartik]

The defense, "look I'm just trying to say that if he would think it was his duty to go out and put out fires, then obviously it makes sense that he would think it's his duty to go out and kill everyone and let god sort em out. Potato, potato."

lol

[starkind]

I'm surprised Kyle hasn't been basically institutionalized and under the scrutiny of psychiatrists and children's protective services daily.

Or has he? Like. No offense but I had the hammer dropped on me as a kid. So I know what is possible.

[Gustoo]

When you're a media spectacle they drop different hammers. When you're under the radar they throw you under the bus. 100%