Calling all Charm Killing Pro's

[jarlerop]

This message is hidden because paulgiamatti is on your ignore list.
Lovely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[paulgiamatti]

Wow, yep, he sure got me by having a full-on rage-induced meltdown in which he typed up an illegible mountain of ad hominem salad, which raised approximately zero thoughtful or provocative points. Ouch.

[waltjig]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not quite as irrational as the person who thinks when someone refers to six pages of a thread, that they themselves authored every post in those six pages.

I mean, do I really need to give you guys a course in reasoning by analogy? Like, topic is to setting as plot is to discussion at hand? Please at least reassure me that I can post on the P99 message boards at more than an elementary school reading level.

You are smart as fuck. Can you tutor my child over skype?

[rollin5k]

Jingle bells jingle bells jingle nerds are fat

[Trollhide]

Why is this stupid thread 13 pages long this shit is in black and white on the wiki

[Grimjaw]

wow there are a lot of morons here. btw if you have a decent reading comprehension, you can see that paulgiamatti gave sound advice which is correlated with other posts throughout this entire fail-thread

[Dreenk317]

Originally Posted by Grimjaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

wow there are a lot of morons here. btw if you have a decent reading comprehension, you can see that paulgiamatti gave sound advice which is correlated with other posts throughout this entire fail-thread

I just re read every post he's made in this thread, yes I'm bored. But that's beside the point.

PaulG gave some advice in his posts that are on the first three pages. The advice he gave was disagreed with, evidence was given in the form of personal experiences from many people. I'm paraphrasing here, but PaulG's response to everyone that disagreed with him was along the lines of "I'm right, your wrong." Though he failed to give any proof to back up his arguments, even in the form of his personal experiences. When asked for proof of any kind his usual answer was to insult people's reading comprehension.

To add to that, past page three he failed to give any advice that relates to the original questions asked by the OP. And instead devolved into long winded insults towards many people that had responded with anything that disagreed with his already given advice.

I'm not sure what posts of his you read that made you think he gave "sound advice" when nearly everyone else disagreed with him. But ok.

[Ikon]

Why are you guys still arguing about it lol. I posted a link from 2000 from a developer, the developer, stating pets take 1% exp in a group and no more. Its extremely unlikely the devs didn't also find that link or others like it.

[SoekiWiz]

Poll is up since this thread has gone to shit anyway!

Have fun.

Logging in momentarily to do my necro testing. Will post data in a new thread, which this fucking moron will not hijack [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[SoekiWiz]

Originally Posted by Grimjaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

wow there are a lot of morons here. btw if you have a decent reading comprehension, you can see that paulgiamatti gave sound advice which is correlated with other posts throughout this entire fail-thread

Provided complete and total misinformation, then attempted to back it up when it was pointed out.

Reading comprehension - I do not think this means what you think it means. Knowing all the words doesn't mean you comprehend what's going on.