Server favors FAT! All other guilds just give up!

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I understand that reading can be challenging but it is also fundamental. Exactly who was camped out under telk to pull? The person who pet pulled ran there from the entrance. You could bind in ToV on live so exactly how is binding in ToV now an infraction?

You don't have to ALL start from the entrance, the current rule for ToV is that you cannot pull a raid mob from the wing your raid is set up in. Meaning Divinity pulling Telk while they were in WToV farming trash was an infraction. The entrance is just not a wing therefore you can pull any mob from any wing there. Thanks for proving that your incompetence extends past your play.



exactly, fraps or it didn't happen... the accuser has the burden of proof not the accused

Where in the raid rules does it talk about wings. It talks about zones, period. When I walk through the arches into West I don't zone. Your entire raid needs to start from the entrance (minus your two trackers) and you shouldn't be using any binds past the entrance to facilitate a pull, period.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Parking at the WToV zone out is more than allowed as long as they don't engage any WToV bosses while they are set up in WToV. Basically the pulls consist of a Coth from a tracker and a FTE from someone at the zone, explain how that doesn't follow the raid rules.

How is him gating north being bound near the raid mob in question?

Telk took 4 mallet charges and kept running north from what I have heard, he was also pulled off of the train at one point by someone not associated with the FTE which is also an infraction I believe.

Even on live you were able to bind at PoM if you chose to.

There's no point in discussing this with you. I'll just go with what Sirken or Rogean have to say. The rules are clear cut, you developed your own interpretation of those rules to facilitate your agenda. That's the status quo on this server, push the limit until you get punished.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=220664

Perhaps you should try and stay caught up in raid rule developments if you are going to continue and pretend to be relevant.

I don't see anything from Sirken or Rogean there. Like I said, you're creating your own interpretation of the rules outside of what is actually written.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He made the thread and didn't correct them. By your logic that means he agrees doesn't it? at least that was the logic used when raid encounters were broken right?

Cool, I'm going to go make a post in raid discussion right now saying BDA is allowed to sit on any raid spawn we want in ToV, until Sirken corrects that post I'll assume it's ok.

You're literally an idiot.

[dafier]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Parking at the WToV zone out is more than allowed as long as they don't engage any WToV bosses while they are set up in WToV. Basically the pulls consist of a Coth from a tracker and a FTE from someone at the zone, explain how that doesn't follow the raid rules.

How is him gating north being bound near the raid mob in question?

Telk took 4 mallet charges and kept running north from what I have heard, he was also pulled off of the train at one point by someone not associated with the FTE which is also an infraction I believe.

Even on live you were able to bind at PoM if you chose to.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[indiscriminate_hater]

Originally Posted by dafier [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He keeps that hanging over our heads. So when I ask for loot next time, Chest says, "Remember that time you weren't at Tormax" and I reply with, "Yes sire. Forgive me for even thinking I can get loot over your 100 alts."

Ya....that sums it up.

BDA spin team doing good work - only 5 mins to wrap up that glaring plot hole

[Sweettouch]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what rules exactly were broken?

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=220664

Perhaps you should try and stay caught up in raid rule developments if you are going to continue and pretend to be relevant.

Your shitty alliances members said that shit,sirken didn't.

[dafier]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BDA isn't relevant

This. Please share more.

[Sweettouch]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Or, BDA isn't relevant so no one bothered to ask them for their input. Abide by the rules set down by your betters

YOU A BETTER?! Wow,a homeless man attempting to rape me or kill me is better than you idiots. You all blatantly break rules and act superior when GMs don't give enough of a shit to punish you. That will all change soon

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by BillSmith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, it was what was agreed upon with sirken, at least that's how I read it.

It was agreed upon because Sirken didn't correct it??? Do you honestly think that's how things work? I'm not even mad, I'm impressed.