Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2014, 02:11 PM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

How about we just go back to old rules before this class system. Too many rules not being upheld. Keep the rotation and go back to what we did before.
  #2  
Old 08-29-2014, 02:39 PM
Gaffin 7.0 Gaffin 7.0 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton05 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about we just go back to old rules before this class system. Too many rules not being upheld. Keep the rotation and go back to what we did before.
  #3  
Old 08-29-2014, 04:22 PM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton05 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about we just go back to old rules before this class system. Too many rules not being upheld. Keep the rotation and go back to what we did before.
And no csr in vp
  #4  
Old 08-29-2014, 04:47 PM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And no csr in vp
Stop teasing me! Also under the old rules at least sev loot wouldn't of been deleted (grats AG) also BDA wouldn't get in trouble for "helping" idk I prefer more of the Wild West no rules FTE is king. No standing on zone in pad or coth race (which in fact makes certain classes completely useless due to priority)
  #5  
Old 08-30-2014, 01:13 PM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton05 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about we just go back to old rules before this class system. Too many rules not being upheld. Keep the rotation and go back to what we did before.
Youd be crazy to think theyd give up their vending machines man. Its funny because before all these retarded rules, their big stance was "we dont want to track and batphone at 4am", but that is exactly what they do now.

No, instead of going back to the way it was, theyd rather push for a C/R/C/R system, eliminating the FFA all together. This will never happen tho. If they wanna get rid of FFA it would need to look something like C/C/R/C/C/R

With 16 hour windows and the no poopsocking rule the raid scene would have been fine without all this carebear WoW shit.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #6  
Old 08-29-2014, 05:38 PM
Lisset Lisset is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 295
Default

I hate pvp servers. Having said that I would love to see a month long trial of making the zone pvp when a raid mob spawns. Sure, it would suck for those not going after dragons but for all the others it would be awesome. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 08-29-2014, 11:34 PM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisset [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I hate pvp servers. Having said that I would love to see a month long trial of making the zone pvp when a raid mob spawns. Sure, it would suck for those not going after dragons but for all the others it would be awesome. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I went red and sat on spawns. I had back up. But to jeremy, aalpha, and a few others (minus yapas, who I never wanted to kill.) I was red and welcomed jousting, jeremy was the only to meet me in the middle,
While dragons we're killed we jousted in vp. Don't think either of us had a killing blow of each other. But I sure got a few on every one else lol. Still love all y'all.
  #8  
Old 08-30-2014, 01:50 AM
abacab-101 abacab-101 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 31
Default

I remember when raid mobs spawned everyone was already there, and we tried to out DPS one another.

Bring back 2009/2010 pls.
  #9  
Old 08-27-2014, 11:56 AM
Locust Locust is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just facts [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Funny how OP and the rest of the so called righteous people of this server pretend that if AG and the rest of the guilds that tracked on the spawn spot hadn't messed up, Taken would have not have had FTE on that dragon....

Did everyone miss the GM log posts?
That clearly showed that the Taken guild FTE player was 11 sec ahead of the next FTE attempt to attack the dragon before TMO.

Basically TWO guilds in that log has their FTE players tag first, without having their trackers get aggro first, Taken & TMO, and Taken FTE player was 11 sec ahead of TMO. (I would guess because TMO's mage got feared, due to the raid interfering from the other guilds, and were prevented from casting their coth spells, it's the same thing as training another guilds tracker, every tracker on the spawn spot should be happy that TMO did not go for raid suspensions for the raid interference from the other guilds on the spawn spot)

What is most surprising is why Taken & TMO didn't petition all the others for raid interfering.

FACTS: if the trackers from the other guilds hadn't messed up the tracking by standing on the spawn spot, it would have been a Taken vs TMO race, Taken because they had their trackers out of range of spawn aggro and TMO because they made sure their Tracker didn't get first aggro.

FACTS: TMO's attempt was interfered with due to other guilds having KOS trackers on the spawn spot, basically TMO was forced to give TAKEN a head start of the duration on the fear spell = giving Taken a free shot at the dragon.

IF anyone should be pissed right now it's TMO that had their attempt interfered with by the guilds that had their KOS trackers on the spawn.

it's not supprising that the other guild are trying to shift the focus and blame to someone else other then them selfs and from what I've seen sofar it looks like it's working, as far as I know TMO has not petitioned AG/IB/BDA for raid interfering with their attempt at a FFA dragon forcing them to give TAKEN guild a free shot at a dragon.

Keep creating new posts and maybe someone from TMO might create that petition and have the three guilds suspended.
FACT: taken has no way of knowing they were second on FTE list after AG

FACT: doesn't matter even if they did know

FACT: you don't kill a raid target without FTE

FACT: i'm in BDA and agreeing with a TMO RnF post and it feels weird in my butt
__________________
Grew | Stable | Doub | Bubb | Locust
  #10  
Old 08-27-2014, 12:31 PM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just facts [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
as far as I know TMO has not petitioned AG/IB/BDA for raid interfering with their attempt at a FFA dragon forcing them to give TAKEN guild a free shot at a dragon.

Keep creating new posts and maybe someone from TMO might create that petition and have the three guilds suspended.
We haven't and we won't.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.