|
|
|
|
#1
06-25-2013, 12:54 PM
|
|||
|
Except that prior to this post there had never been a rule or concern raised about retaining the bind, so much so that in fact Amelinda and others knew about it and specifically stated it wasn't an issue. Now we're told that anything she ever said doesn't matter and it's an exploit. It's fine and dandy you want to change binds going forward, and everyone should comply with the rule, but it doesn't make sense to call it an exploit given the history. It also seems inconsistent that when the CT cycle was triggered a month ago we used Amelinda's ruling per Sirken / Zade, but now with this issue Amelinda's ruling doesn't matter. Which is it?
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
06-25-2013, 12:58 PM
|
|||
|
you couldnt bind in KC on live, you can do it here?
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
06-25-2013, 01:01 PM
|
|||
|
well ive been afk from in-game for a long time. only logging in here and there. but seriously you couldnt bind in KC on live, why is it allowed here?
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
06-25-2013, 01:03 PM
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
06-25-2013, 01:08 PM
|
|||
|
"Relive the classic Everquest MMORPG Gaming Experience as it was in 1999 and onward. Project 1999 is a free to play Emulated Everquest Server giving Players the opportunity to experience Classic EQ Once again, starting with the original 3 continents and a max level of 50, with the look and feel of the old interface and several modifications making game mechanics similar to how the game used to be. Project 1999 is the best and most popular classic Everquest experience."
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
06-25-2013, 01:15 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
