Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2013, 02:52 AM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 644
Default

by the way, you're totally ignoring the plethora of studies that say circumcision decreases risk of HIV, oncogenic types of HPV, HSV-2, penile cancer, cervical cancer in hetero partners, phimosis, balanitis, and UTIs. randomized controlled trials show no clinically significant difference in sexual satisfaction or function between circumcised/uncircumcised.

depending on society, there can also be vast differences in aesthetic preference among sexual partners

complication rate is exceptionally low, and risks are very minor

basically, it's a minor elective procedure with a handful of mildly beneficial effects and very few risks. the only reason to get worked up about it is if you're an uninformed bigot, which you are.
  #2  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:00 AM
Kagatob Kagatob is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
by the way, you're totally ignoring the plethora of studies that say circumcision decreases risk of HIV, oncogenic types of HPV, HSV-2, penile cancer, cervical cancer in hetero partners, phimosis, balanitis, and UTIs. randomized controlled trials show no clinically significant difference in sexual satisfaction or function between circumcised/uncircumcised.

depending on society, there can also be vast differences in aesthetic preference among sexual partners

complication rate is exceptionally low, and risks are very minor

basically, it's a minor elective procedure with a handful of mildly beneficial effects and very few risks. the only reason to get worked up about it is if you're an uninformed bigot, which you are.
Your posting history only shows that your bias is anything but medical. I suggest you reflect on all of the garbage that you've been posting when it's been pointed out multiple times your sources are biased for a plethora of reasons. Particularly noteworthy when you resort to invoking for how it's an "aesthetic preference depending upon society".
If I cared what newborn-dick-sucking primitives cared about I'd be in a whole heap of trouble.
  #3  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:52 AM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
by the way, you're totally ignoring the plethora of studies that say circumcision decreases risk of HIV, oncogenic types of HPV, HSV-2, penile cancer, cervical cancer in hetero partners, phimosis, balanitis, and UTIs. randomized controlled trials show no clinically significant difference in sexual satisfaction or function between circumcised/uncircumcised.

depending on society, there can also be vast differences in aesthetic preference among sexual partners

complication rate is exceptionally low, and risks are very minor

basically, it's a minor elective procedure with a handful of mildly beneficial effects and very few risks. the only reason to get worked up about it is if you're an uninformed bigot, which you are.
ps still waiting for counter argument based in fact rather than virulent bigotry
  #4  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:08 AM
Kagatobs Kagatobs is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ps still waiting for counter argument based in fact rather than virulent bigotry
Doesn't happen.
I
D
I
O
T
  #5  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:09 AM
Kagatob Kagatob is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ps still waiting for counter argument based in fact rather than virulent bigotry
http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/sam...wFile/254/2144
http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/sam...File/1811/2152
http://sti.bmj.com/content/84/Suppl_2/ii28.abstract
http://intactnews.org/node/119/
Just a few I could come up with after a quick google search.

It's interesting to compare which studies were conducted by americans abroad and which studies weren't. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:10 AM
Kagatobs Kagatobs is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/sam...wFile/254/2144
http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/sam...File/1811/2152
http://sti.bmj.com/content/84/Suppl_2/ii28.abstract
http://intactnews.org/node/119/
Just a few I could come up with after a quick google search.

It's interesting to compare which studies were conducted by americans abroad and which studies weren't. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:14 AM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Your posting history only shows that your bias is anything but medical. I suggest you reflect on all of the garbage that you've been posting when it's been pointed out multiple times your sources are biased for a plethora of reasons. Particularly noteworthy when you resort to invoking for how it's an "aesthetic preference depending upon society".
If I cared what newborn-dick-sucking primitives cared about I'd be in a whole heap of trouble.
my sources are peer reviewed medical studies including randomized controlled trials, most of which were cited by the CDC, the WHO, and/or the NIH.

you have no sources because you're an ignorant bigot
  #8  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:21 AM
Kagatob Kagatob is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Masturbation is evil, anyone who spills seed is a bigot
I just wanted to say it now because you all knew it was coming anyway.
  #9  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:26 AM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

My question is, who the fuck cares if a baby is circumcised or not. Being on a side against "forcing" babies to be circumcised is a losing battle, I know personally I'm glad I was circumcised and my penis doesn't look like some elephant dick, I'm also glad because I don't scare off woman every time I whip it out.

There is also scientific evidence from the evolution I guess you could call it, from a baby to "adulthood" lets call it, and guess what, they don't give a shit either, so why the fuck even argue that its messed up to supposedly force a baby to do it, as you know, seeing the pros as a parent, make the choice to do it after weighing the pros and the cons. Personally to me, from the research I did before having my son circumcised, the benefits looked better (I was going to do it anyways, but actually wanted to read why people do it).
  #10  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:28 AM
Kagatob Kagatob is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My question is, who the fuck cares if a baby is circumcised or not. Being on a side against "forcing" babies to be circumcised is a losing battle, I know personally I'm glad I was circumcised and my penis doesn't look like some elephant dick, I'm also glad because I don't scare off woman every time I whip it out.
Speaking of unfounded biases. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.