Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:38 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

I'm sure it'll be fun and all but like get your own thread, assholes
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #122  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:42 PM
Frieza_Prexus Frieza_Prexus is offline
Fire Giant

Frieza_Prexus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 749
Default

Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6
  #123  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:42 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sure it'll be fun and all but like get your own thread, assholes
Truth, I am sure there will be 5 more threads about me shortly. Maybe I will get my own website too!
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #124  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:44 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #125  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:51 PM
Nerosys Nerosys is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.
Translation ...
You made a bet, got caught with your dick in your mouth and its taken you 3 weeks to come up with this piss poor excuse got it.
  #126  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:02 PM
Hurley Hurley is offline
Kobold

Hurley's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
jesus christ not again you fuckin losers - shut up

take it to pms and keep our precious thread pure
hello jeremy
__________________
  #127  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:04 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.
holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed
  #128  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:12 PM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol you derp, you do realize that was a troll right?
ya which is why you had a guildmate saying you had a thread crying about your dkp right aftewards...
  #129  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:14 PM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed
alarti being stupid and a POS? Go figure.
  #130  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:21 PM
Missingo Missingo is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: California
Posts: 97
Default

I'd probably choose TMO due to just me and my friends never having problems with any of them. My one friend had an issue with some FE guys while in Chardok about a month or two ago. He was killing outside of Chardok and got into a little bit of trouble so he zones in to clear aggro (he is at about 45%ish health, about 6 FE guys are sitting at ZI. Some random guy walks towards zone in with a mob on him and dies, training my friend. Friend begins to fight mob, asks the FE's guys for some help. They don't answer although one stands up then sits back down and another buffs the warrior in their group. My friends character dies (no biggie, I will rez him later), about 10 seconds after dying he gets a really nasty tell from one of the FE guys cursing at him for training them yadda yadda.

Now I'm not saying those in FE are bad people just saying that I tend to play with my friend a lot and if I was to join one guild he would probably come along with me.. and he has FE crossed off due to that encounter
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.