![]() |
|
#1261
|
|||
|
Ok wait. A scientist often accepts conclusions from peer reviewed sources without developing empirical data correct?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#1262
|
|||
|
And, in fact, scientists recognize the gap between what they perceive as data and objective reality, right???
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#1263
|
|||
|
And, in fact, with our imperfect senses in mind, empirical data isn't really that good after all, is it?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#1264
|
|||
|
Eyewitness testimony being what it is..........
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#1265
|
|||
|
So explain to me again how scientists don't have complete trust and/or confidence in not only the data gathered by other scientists, but their very own results. Please.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#1266
|
|||
|
From the Oxford Dictionaries:
Definition of faith noun [mass noun] 1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something | ||
|
|
|||
|
#1267
|
|||
|
OH SHIT IS THAT THE DEFINITION OF FAITH FROM OXFORD BEING EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAID IT WASNT?!?!?
OH SHIT!!! | ||
|
|
|||
|
#1268
|
|||
|
What a maroon.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#1269
|
|||
|
Nice try quoting half of the definition....
"2. Strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof:" As the scientific method only applies to definition 1, we can agree that 'faith' in science and 'faith in religion' are indeed two different things linked only by semantics.
__________________
Wazzock - Ogre Warrior
Pillock - Iksar Monk Urgh - Troll Shadowknight Twerp - Ogre Shaman Numpty - Halfling Warrior Tosser - Gnome Enchanter | ||
|
|
|||
|
#1270
|
|||
|
Also, I pointed out the uncertain nature of our own perception and sense-data previously. As this applies to everything we know, it is hardly a reason for equating the two things.
__________________
Wazzock - Ogre Warrior
Pillock - Iksar Monk Urgh - Troll Shadowknight Twerp - Ogre Shaman Numpty - Halfling Warrior Tosser - Gnome Enchanter | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|