Are we allowed to like AI art?

[Duik]

I comply with my silicon based (lolocaust!) overlords.

[Smoofers]

This whole thread is people who didn't make it coping about why they didn't make it.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If AI ever writes a joke that funny I will worship it and ban all religions.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If AI ever writes a joke that funny I will worship it and ban all religions.

Mig15's aside, a faggoter was someone who was by fate or fortune unable to acquire proper firewood otherwise, so they had to collect small bits of fallen wood to cook their food and heat their hovels. A poor person.

Society was pretty mean back then.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's actually quite good in the "creative" conceptual phase of a project.

Often giving new ideas and thinking outside the box!

Unique patterns, crazy vistas, strange characters.

It's quite good at creating strange new things.

Sure ... but it produces mountains of crap also, which is why you need the human to decide what's interesting/creative and what's crap.

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If AI ever writes a joke that funny I will worship it and ban all religions.

As proof of the above, go watch AI Seinfeld aka Nothing Forever. I watched it for maybe 20 minutes, and there wasn't even an inadvertently funny joke, let alone an actual one. Maybe if you watched it long enough you'd find one ... but again, at that point it's just a human using a tool.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure ... but it produces mountains of crap also, which is why you need the human to decide what's interesting/creative and what's crap.

Well previously you were saying AI couldn't create anything new, yet it's being used to do exactly that.

Here is another example:

Researchers use AI-powered database to design potential cancer drug in 30 days

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/researc...r-drug-30-days

I'd say a cure for liver cancer is pretty new.

But we shouldn't use this cure, because it's "theft" right?

BTW it seems to me you are not saying anything that disagree's with anything Ive said, and to double check I asked chatgpt to try to parse this current discussion over teh last few pages:

Conclusion:
While they seem to be debating, Shovelquest and Loramin are largely in agreement on the fundamental point: AI is a powerful tool that can enhance creativity in game development, but it requires a human touch to shape and refine the output into something special. The debate is more about the extent of AI's creative capabilities and the balance between AI's role as a creative assistant versus a primary creator.

[shovelquest]

Look at this poor retch! Gathering his wood, instead of cutting it from waist height like us, Thor!

[sajbert]

12 pages. I give up.

[Duik]

A.I wouldnt give up.
It would just draw hands badly until you dumbarse humans feed it enough info to finally get it right.
Keep feeding it and ask it for an EQ game based on Shadowbane or Pokemon or whatever your poison.

Then, when the A.I owners have enough training material ingested they will sell the fuck outta that shit and screw you (us) dumbarses over.

Pff. 12 pages is nothing. You lack the intestinal fortitude to outlast the A.I. Toughen up, princess.

[shovelquest]

What's your problem with R2-D2!