Probably time for a Kyle Rittenhouse thread.

[Gustoo]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where he was and why is a different conversation.

good post

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

can't you read? he used deadly force only after a clear and present danger was presented to his person, not property.

The clear and present danger of having a plastic bag(Rosenbaum) and a skateboard (Huber) thrown at you.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The clear and present danger of having a plastic bag(Rosenbaum) and a skateboard (Huber) thrown at you.

Yes, because if they take your gun from you, they are now armed with your gun.

And people generally do not throw shit at a person with a gun, unless they are highly unstable and unpredictable.

Kyle literally did nothing wrong, there is no case against him.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, because if they take your gun from you, they are now armed with your gun.

Think about that for 3 seconds. The threat of someone taking your gun from you would justify deadly force in any and all situations where you have a gun.

I bet you feel pretty silly right now. 😜

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Think about that for 3 seconds. The threat of someone taking your gun from you would justify deadly force in any and all situations where you have a gun.

I bet you feel pretty silly right now. ��

Under any circumstance, an attempt to forcibly disarm a person is considered a clear and present danger to anyone in posession of a firearm. The only reason one would attempt to disarm an individual by force is to reduce their combat posture to such a degree that your own use of any force will not be hindered.

Correct Assumption: If you are gonna pull the gun from my hands, you intend to use it, or your own force against me.

so go out and test your theory by reaching to grab a holstered firearm from someone open carrying, then go ahead and try to assume control of a cop's holstered firearm.

check back and let me know how that works out.

If some dude is wielding a firearm, the police don't try to close the distance and take control of the gun with their own hands, they shoot until the subject is down.

Any thoughts to the contrary come from a place of ignorance with regard to firearm law, training, and experience.

[myrddraal]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, because if they take your gun from you, they are now armed with your gun.

And people generally do not throw shit at a person with a gun, unless they are highly unstable and unpredictable.

Kyle literally did nothing wrong, there is no case against him.

Pretty sure thats not why he broke down like a bitch.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by myrddraal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure thats not why he broke down like a bitch.

Maybe he did because shooting people takes an obvious mental toll, not to mention being the object of half the country's ire for the last year and a half.

Free and fair open question here: What would the rioter nutjobs had to have done in order for you to consider it justified for kyle to use his weapon in self defense?

I mean, it's already totally justified, but you obviously disagree. So, what *would* it take for you to say it was justified?

[Jibartik]

alpha male democrats.

[Jibartik]

"why were you running at the fire? what was so urgent?"

"because it's a fire?"

"there's fires all over the place."

"I was going to the fire to put it out?"

"why would you think that you should go around and put out fires?"

lol I think this prosecutor is an alien he doesn't seem to understand our customs at all.

[Jibartik]

The defense, "look I'm just trying to say that if he would think it was his duty to go out and put out fires, then obviously it makes sense that he would think it's his duty to go out and kill everyone and let god sort em out. Potato, potato."

lol