Hunter Biden Under Federal Investigation

[imperiouskitten]

Originally Posted by Babizul [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How are your parents?

My Dad is my hero and my Mom is objectively a hero

[FatherSioux]

Originally Posted by imperiouskitten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I'm saying each of those things exist to a certain extent. Lol, looks like mentioning Russian psyops triggered you.

As for you, I'd keep your secret if I thought you were ashamed, but nah -- more like, incognito. Looks like you realize that your belief that your domestic political opposition must die means nobody will take you seriously. Better reroll and hide yourself.

Again, you're interpreting my words in the worst possible light. Not a move from someone who proports to be an enlightened being.

[imperiouskitten]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, you're interpreting my words in the worst possible light. Not a move from someone who proports to be an enlightened being.

Nice, got your goat. First you joke, now you really want us to forget. Cuck yourself and post a false denial or gtfo, purge man.

[Thulian]

Lol hunter is fucked and biden wont be president you guys watch the news? I thought it was 1 allegation its like 15 and they have all the wires as proof

100% fucked

[Gravydoo II]

The difference between trump people and normal people is we can say "criminals should be punished if convicted or admits guilt."

You'd say "trump has never done anything wrong, illegal, or immoral. If he did, that guy did worse. If he did it twice, its ok, not a big deal. What are you, Magnum PI?." If found guilty, you'd say the judge was "biased" or "he had it out for trump. Hes a democrat. He hates trump." or something to that effect.

[Thulian]

Trump was investigated many times, why didnt they find anything or convict?

He even had a special council to dig up dirt

found nothing, sorry you lost and your country sucks gravy. Better luck next time

[Gravydoo II]

You cant charge a sitting president... You can impeach, but republicans said no evidence is allowed in the impeachment, last time. Only once removed can you charge a former president.

You ever heard of Cy Vance, the Manhattan DA? You might want to google "trump cy vance" and prepare to be let down.

[Gravydoo II]

Oh and one last thing. You might want to read this.

In testimony before Congress, Mueller was asked by Republican Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado, "Could you charge the President with a crime after he left office?"
"Yes," Mueller replied.

"You believe that he committed -- you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?" Buck asked.
Mueller answered: "Yes."

This too.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...legal-threats/

Oh I know, its all fake news til it aint.

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh and one last thing. You might want to read this.

In testimony before Congress, Mueller was asked by Republican Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado, "Could you charge the President with a crime after he left office?"
"Yes," Mueller replied.

"You believe that he committed -- you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?" Buck asked.
Mueller answered: "Yes."

This too.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...legal-threats/

Oh I know, its all fake news til it aint.

Well that settles it then!

Why would they bother going through with an arduous impeachment song and dance knowing that there's no possible way to remove him? Why not just wait until he's out of office then bring charges if they already know that's the only way it will mean anything? Occam's razor man, use it.

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well that settles it then!

Why would they bother going through with an arduous impeachment song and dance knowing that there's no possible way to remove him? Why not just wait until he's out of office then bring charges if they already know that's the only way it will mean anything? Occam's razor man, use it.

What do you call a trial where you're not allowed to submit evidence?? Is that a trial, at all?