Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:32 AM
Dabamf Dabamf is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well not exactly but you did say this a few pages ago.



I'm not sure what your getting at with this. Do you want what will benefit you or something that will benefit the life and growth of the entire server/community?
Because the server has always been advertised as being Vanilla EQ, that's what people come here for: NATURAL PROGRESSION
You're picking at the informal nature of my post rather than addressing my actual points, and when you do address something it is taken out of context. I only said kunark harms people to draw contrast with my point, which was that opening hate cannot possibly harm anyone. You haven't addressed that. The kunark comment wasn't the focus. It's an argument technique. If you accept some of your opponents ideas temporarily, and can prove them wrong using their own assumptions, it is a stronger argument because you have fewer points of disagreement.

I'm choosing to ignore your other points for pragmatic reasons because we're never gonna make any progress. I'd have to be on shrooms to understand what the hell you're talking about.

Anyway, they are following the exact order so far that they posted in the past. So there can be no complaint.
Last edited by Dabamf; 02-08-2010 at 01:35 AM..
  #2  
Old 02-08-2010, 12:20 AM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dabamf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And from a purely item quality standpoint, everyone should want manastones & rubi over solro stuff. There's not a single item in the game that could even compare to the benefit of a manastone.
I can think of quite a few classes that gain absolutely no benefit from either item(assuming you are refering specifically to the Rubi BP , do I need to list them?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dabamf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you don't care about having a manastone, you don't care about being good.
And this just made me laugh out loud!!!
How on Earth did people manage back in the day? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
  #3  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:20 AM
yaaaflow yaaaflow is offline
Sarnak

yaaaflow's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I can think of quite a few classes that gain absolutely no benefit from either item(assuming you are refering specifically to the Rubi BP , do I need to list them?
Really? Please do. I'm trying to think of classes that aren't improved by having a manastone or a rubi bp, and so far I've come up with monk. Is there possibly any other class where either increasing their HP regen, or increasing their ability to get mana would not be beneficial. Hell, it would be beneficial for a monk, but they just can't wear the bp. What other classes could possibly not want one of those items, provided they could use it?
  #4  
Old 02-07-2010, 08:49 PM
yaaaflow yaaaflow is offline
Sarnak

yaaaflow's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
Default

The hate release does have a trickle-down effect helping the non-raiding crowd too, for what it's worth. There are members of divinity, IB and trannys constantly camping stuff such as manastones, rubi bps, yaks, fbss, etc purely for selling profit. More raid targets means more of their time in game is spent not taking camps from people who are trying to camp up their own stone, or rubi, or whatever for personal use.
  #5  
Old 02-07-2010, 09:22 PM
Finawin Finawin is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 492
Send a message via AIM to Finawin
Default

I still fail to see where they said they would adhere to that "timeline" and everyone assuming they are is annoying to listen to.

8 fucking months of fighting over the same stuff? No thanks.
  #6  
Old 02-07-2010, 09:39 PM
yaaaflow yaaaflow is offline
Sarnak

yaaaflow's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
Default

At this point in classic there was no blue bar in the exp bar. I, for one, am enraged that the GM staff would think they have the right to leave that blue exp bar in the game. EVERYTHING MUST BE LIKE CLASSIC RAAWWWRRRR
  #7  
Old 02-07-2010, 10:34 PM
Anuril Anuril is offline
Kobold

Anuril's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaaaflow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
At this point in classic there was no blue bar in the exp bar. I, for one, am enraged that the GM staff would think they have the right to leave that blue exp bar in the game. EVERYTHING MUST BE LIKE CLASSIC RAAWWWRRRR
Nice attempt, but it is now clear you have missed the point completely. People aren't upset over P1999's failure to accurately reproduce every fucking aspect of classic EQ. What people are upset about is the DEVs yielding to the QQ demands of you raid guild types. I'm happy that you guys have some new content(POH) to devour, but the timing of POH release coupled with a failure to implement Temple of Sol Ro sets a bad precedent as has been stated before in this very thread!
  #8  
Old 02-07-2010, 10:46 PM
Dabamf Dabamf is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anuril [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nice attempt, but it is now clear you have missed the point completely. People aren't upset over P1999's failure to accurately reproduce every fucking aspect of classic EQ. What people are upset about is the DEVs yielding to the QQ demands of you raid guild types. I'm happy that you guys have some new content(POH) to devour, but the timing of POH release coupled with a failure to implement Temple of Sol Ro sets a bad precedent as has been stated before in this very thread!
How about holding the complaints until/unless something is done that actually harms you, instead of speculating that they might harm you?
  #9  
Old 02-07-2010, 10:51 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dabamf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about holding the complaints until/unless something is done that actually harms you, instead of speculating that they might harm you?
While I think that guy is dumb too, this logic is flawed. Let me take the logic into another context:

How about not taking steps to minimize risks / teach her to defend herself until/unless someone actually rapes your daughter, instead of speculating that they might harm her?

With this albeit extreme comparison, you can see that while that dude is a dipshit, he is within logical boundries to speculate about the future.
__________________
  #10  
Old 02-07-2010, 10:53 PM
Anuril Anuril is offline
Kobold

Anuril's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dabamf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about holding the complaints until/unless something is done that actually harms you, instead of speculating that they might harm you?
Hey dude are you a high school counselor irl or something? Cause you sure do seem to have an obsession with offering terrible advice on how I should handle things. How about you stop telling me what to think and when to think it. I know your some hot shot in this game, but just remember that doesn't translate to real life, bro.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.