skill-based pro-pickup raid nilbogcare system, or why should you get along

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course not. Who would be left to buy their epics?

Seems even without TMO raiding this shitty attitude persists. Maybe it was you all along!

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-You may not engage a raid target with more than 40 players.

-Once your guild has killed raid npc 'X', your next engagement on that target must be attempted with 50% less players.

-If the raid npc remains up until 6 hours have passed, it becomes open to everyone again.

-If any of this is violated, [something really bad] happens.

Thoughts behind this:
-Zerg membership does not help; it hurts - the opposite of what we have now.

-Once a guild's engagement count ran low, there might be skill involved with fights.

-Eventually even the smallest guild or pick-up raid would get a shot at targets.


If left solely to me, this is the type of system that would be implemented. Good luck on agreements!

<3

This is very good. Simple, fair, still challenging, rewards those that put in effort, has a spirit of competition.

but in all honesty nilbog you could come up with the worst system ever and half the server would support it because its got your name on it =p

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seems even without TMO raiding this shitty attitude persists. Maybe it was you all along!

No you.

[Fazlazen]

I support this idea. A new blue server with 0 CSR would also be pretty cool.

[Versus]

How about we just leave everything as it is except if someone petitions something that is found to be nonsense (Kite that wasn't a kite, FTE question when it's clear due to the emote) you suspend them for a week.

[Clark]

Originally Posted by tacite [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol

[Clark]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what happened to your vision of a true classic server? the mainproblem here is this aged server. just open another blue one, close red and restart red with pnp at start and not years later.

or better, wipe blue and restart it with the current build. there have been way to many xploits in p99 history.

<3

Mitic for President.

[Hinshi Budou]

Can we has a sullon zek please?

0 room for excuses, bickering etc... cause no rules.

[Arteker]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-You may not engage a raid target with more than 40 players.

-Once your guild has killed raid npc 'X', your next engagement on that target must be attempted with 50% less players.

-If the raid npc remains up until 6 hours have passed, it becomes open to everyone again.

-If any of this is violated, [something really bad] happens.

Thoughts behind this:
-Zerg membership does not help; it hurts - the opposite of what we have now.

-Once a guild's engagement count ran low, there might be skill involved with fights.

-Eventually even the smallest guild or pick-up raid would get a shot at targets.


If left solely to me, this is the type of system that would be implemented. Good luck on agreements!

<3

Nillbogg , im dissapointed ,i always believe in you to be the most hardcore supporter of the vision of a perfect and almost true as possible classic server.

while i deem mechanics are time consuming for you who offer this chance to play here free and try ur best to actualy achieve such as cloest as possible server to live i fall to understand this .


if u look at the history of MMos u will see how Developers ideas stoped to being original and good when they tried to be nice to everyone .

u can put Brenlo as a prime example of what happened when due to forum questers soe allowed everyone to unlock jedis in swg, to the massive wow nerfs to some classes due to pvp bgs and the following moans ......

the list goes forever .

i understand eevry server in everquest was different , i know well man , i played eq live for 11 long years , solusek ro server, antonius bayle, stormhammer or legends , Druzzil ro , anyonae ro,,,,,


but with this post i believe the staff and with this i include devs and gms and guide have chosen to cross a line wich imo was wrong .


should take only ur hands to the problems people have with the game not with others players disputes .

Best gms m where always the ones who believe players should always agree and make pacts and take sides and options .

if any of those players harrased menaced the server integrity should be corrected as was done with 3party programs rmt and abusers .


i know i will get mocked and laugh for my english in this post and i dont know even if u would read it but today u have made me a sad fan of your work.

[Ciroco]

Fun idea, but aren't warriors/clerics/rogues valuable enough as it is?