Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know you all want to clown on this dude but, surely it's not that hot of a take to say that at low levels a twinked melee character levels faster than a twinked caster character?

Fight this dude all you want about the shaman thing, I agree that mages can basically go catatonic and contribute a lot of dps to a group, but how the fuck anyone is suggesting a twinked melee character doesn't grind through the first ~25-30 levels faster than a caster seems insane. Melee has always had the advantage with gear early on.

Because he said he wasn't twinked lol. That was the whole point.

Then he come's out and says he has a weapon costing over 1.5k and a haste item lol. As well as Fist of Zek which is not expensive simply because of how much it's dropped, but is a +20 STR item. If you want to talk about a twinked warrior at low levels that's a different conversation from "warriors are better dps than charmed mobs"

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because he said he wasn't twinked lol. That was the whole point.

Then he come's out and says he has a weapon costing over 1.5k and a haste item lol. As well as Fist of Zek which is not expensive simply because of how much it's dropped, but is a +20 STR item. If you want to talk about a twinked warrior at low levels that's a different conversation from "warriors are better dps than charmed mobs"

I am on blue. Prices are much cheaper there. Wurmslayer + SCHW + Fisk of Zek is like 2k total. What world are you living in where people don't have 2k to spend on an alt on a 10 year old emulated server?

You must have a really strict idea about what "twinking" is. I also never said I was parsing with fine steel weapons lol. Not sure where you got that idea. But I am not running around with a CoF, Fungi, Blade of Carnage, etc. and I can out DPS a charmed mob. This really isn't difficult lol.

You are basically now saying OP's group must be starting out naked, with no items or platinum. Nobody ever agreed to these parameters, nor did OP state this is what his group was doing lol.

[Kich867]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because he said he wasn't twinked lol. That was the whole point.

Then he come's out and says he has a weapon costing over 1.5k and a haste item lol. As well as Fist of Zek which is not expensive simply because of how much it's dropped, but is a +20 STR item. If you want to talk about a twinked warrior at low levels that's a different conversation from "warriors are better dps than charmed mobs"

To be clear I think he said he had a raid geared enchanter and a warrior in much worse gear, but, right, "much worse" in that context has a wide range of meanings.

My twinked SK alt is "much better" geared than my warrior that I soloed with, his gear is still shit, but it is much better than the warriors haha.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This really isn't difficult lol.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To be clear I think he said he had a raid geared enchanter and a warrior in much worse gear, but, right, "much worse" in that context has a wide range of meanings.

My twinked SK alt is "much better" geared than my warrior that I soloed with, his gear is still shit, but it is much better than the warriors haha.

That is correct. I am talking about an Enchanter with things like Z Heart vs. a Warrior with Wurmslayer, Fist of Zek, and Silver Chitin Hand Wraps. That is a much different level of gear lol.

[PlsNoBan]

Shamans do as much dmg as mages and warriors out solo enchanters in autismquest. Not in everquest tho.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is correct.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[Kich867]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Dude you gotta get unrustled, you've let this dude get so deep in your brain he's bangin your corpus callosum. It's not worth it.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude you gotta get unrustled, you've let this dude get so deep in your brain he's bangin your corpus callosum. It's not worth it.

Why do you think I am rustled? I am simply attempting to continue the civil discussion(s). It is not my fault if DSM opts out / concedes in silence despite my attempts.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[Kich867]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do you think I am rustled?

He almost certainly ignored you a long time ago, he can't see what you're saying. Relax your shoulders, it helps.