Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2022, 02:36 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The trolls continue to keep themselves known and obvious.It makes it easy for everybody else to see[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, you have provided zero evidence of my trolling despite continuing to call me a troll. Others are not trolls simply because you believe they are or because you state that they are hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you were being serious about trying to combat trolls, you wouldn't take the side of the obvious trolls in this thread. You would be berating them too. Since you are only targeting me, it is clear you either don't understand what trolling is, or don't actually care. If the trolls are on your side, then you don't think they are trolling.
If you were being serious about having a civil discussion you would be able and willing to respond to the factual statements I have made and to answer the simple questions I have posed to you. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I feel bad for all of the trolls in this thread. They are just making themselves look bad, and filling their post histories with nonsense.
Again, you have provided zero evidence of my trolling despite continuing to call me a troll. Others are not trolls simply because you believe they are or because you state that they are hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I will continue to have logical and data driven conversations with people who aren't trolling.
You continue to simply have no "argument(s)" to counter my factual statements, and you simply continue to be ashamed of the answers to the simple questions I have posed to you so you deign to choose to pretend they have not been asked.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
as the data shows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.
How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?
Last edited by cyxthryth; 08-31-2022 at 02:39 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2022, 02:38 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

You seem to think that there is a “everyone else” as if scores of silent observers exist and are monitoring this thread for the delicate knowledge nuggets spilling from your gaping face-hole.

There aren’t.

It’s just you and we the other people posting.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2022, 02:39 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You seem to think that there is a “everyone else” as if scores of silent observers exist and are monitoring this thread for the delicate knowledge nuggets spilling from your gaping face-hole.

There aren’t.

It’s just you and we the other people posting.
The silent majority!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2022, 02:41 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2022, 02:41 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The trolls continue to keep themselves known and obvious.It makes it easy for everybody else to see[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, you have provided zero evidence of my trolling despite continuing to call me a troll. Others are not trolls simply because you believe they are or because you state that they are hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you were being serious about trying to combat trolls, you wouldn't take the side of the obvious trolls in this thread. You would be berating them too. Since you are only targeting me, it is clear you either don't understand what trolling is, or don't actually care. If the trolls are on your side, then you don't think they are trolling.
If you were being serious about having a civil discussion you would be able and willing to respond to the factual statements I have made and to answer the simple questions I have posed to you. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I feel bad for all of the trolls in this thread. They are just making themselves look bad, and filling their post histories with nonsense.
Again, you have provided zero evidence of my trolling despite continuing to call me a troll. Others are not trolls simply because you believe they are or because you state that they are hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I will continue to have logical and data driven conversations with people who aren't trolling.
You continue to simply have no "argument(s)" to counter my factual statements, and you simply continue to be ashamed of the answers to the simple questions I have posed to you so you deign to choose to pretend they have not been asked.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
as the data shows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.
How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2022, 03:01 PM
Kich867 Kich867 is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 676
Default

For fun, from the earlier conversation about how much levels matter, I happen to still have my logs from when I was soloing on my warrior, I wrote a simple parser to pull and summarize the data for all of my Chasm Crawler kills from levels 16-19.

During this time I exclusively killed blue ones. The number is what level I was, my hits aren't how hard I hit, just how many times I hit on average in these fights.

Weapons were: Bullsmasher and Longsword (from a vendor, just the weapon called "Longsword". The TTK listed here is in seconds for easier reading but I didn't convert it later on.

Code:
{
  "16": {
    "averageMyHits": 34.54,
    "averageMyMisses": 12.27,
    "averageMyDps": 3.89,
    "averageTheirHits": 14.18,
    "averageTheirDps": 1.51,
    "averageTtk": 85.59,
    "count": 22
  },
  "17": {
    "averageMyHits": 35.91,
    "averageMyMisses": 11.97,
    "averageMyDps": 4.45,
    "averageTheirHits": 11.02,
    "averageTheirDps": 1.15,
    "averageTtk": 76.43,
    "count": 48
  },
  "18": {
    "averageMyHits": 31,
    "averageMyMisses": 8.33,
    "averageMyDps": 4.84,
    "averageTheirHits": 9.92,
    "averageTheirDps": 1.13,
    "averageTtk": 70.29,
    "count": 54
  }
}
Chasm Crawlers range from levels 11-13, so at 16 all of them are blue. Note the massive difference in TTK (Time to kill) from level 16 to 17, this is due to somewhat frequently running into mobs only 3 levels below me, the data shows that these fights take significantly longer. It's the most noticeable level in which you can absolutely tell whether I'm fighting a level 11 mob or a level 13 mob because the results are consistently very different between them.

For example, a lot of my fights at level 16 against these snakes looked like this, start/end are linux timestamps, TTK is in ms: this is almost certainly a level 13 snake (which actually isn't that hard to prove since mob max damage per hit statically scales with their level for the vast majority of monsters so I might go snag that data point later).
Code:
{
  "start": 1588113011000,
  "myHits": 42,
  "theirHits": 20,
  "myMisses": 18,
  "end": 1588113136000,
  "timeToKill": 125000,
  "myDps": 2.728,
  "theirDps": 1.344
}
Compare this to many of my fights at that level that look like this:

Code:
{
  "start": 1588114078000,
  "myHits": 30,
  "theirHits": 12,
  "myMisses": 8,
  "end": 1588114147000,
  "timeToKill": 69000,
  "myDps": 4.521739130434782,
  "theirDps": 1.3623188405797102
}
Which is almost certainly against a level 11 mob, someone I'm 5 levels above. Note how many fewer hits it takes to kill since I'm hitting for more more often, how many fewer hits I take, and how much less I miss.

At level 18, I was exclusively fighting level 13 snakes, as they're the only ones that con blue at that point. I think its fairly clear that, being 4 or 5 levels above an enemy VS being 2-3 levels above an enemy makes a massive difference in combat even at this low of a level. This gap closes as you gain levels, but that's also why the Blue con gap widens, when you're level 35 you're really looking for level 25 mobs to maintain this kind of lead.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2022, 03:17 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,899
Default

Thanks for the data Kitch867! It's much better than the ceaseless trolling of the other posters.

Nobody has argued that level makes no difference when fighting mobs. I know you are not suggesting that, but this stuff gets lost in the trolling. I know people think I argued that, since I simply asked for some data lol (big sin for some reason here). The post history is there for anybody who thinks this is wrong.

People just got angry when I ask them to provide data, which is the usual problem in this thread. Their claim was a charmed pet is going to massively out-DPS a Warrior, and that my data was simply wrong because the mob I was fighting was lower level.

However, I have shown data where I can maintain higher DPS than a charmed mob on a mob of equal level to my Warrior in the 1-30 range. Nobody is arguing this is true at higher levels, even though people will probably try to claim that. But again, the post history is clear.

Everquest mobs are balanced to be much easier in the low levels (1-39). Level difference at low levels makes less of a difference because mob stats are scaled down too. This is why in the lower levels you can actually solo yellow or even red mobs sometimes, but you can no longer do that in the higher levels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Unanimous experience of many people > faulty and biased data from 1 person.

Sorry to break the bad news
More like "angry trolls who can't admit they are wrong, regardless of what 'experience' they have" < hard data.

Sorry you don't got data. Hope this helps.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-31-2022 at 03:38 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2022, 03:29 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thanks for the data Kitch867! It's much better than the ceaseless trolling of the other posters.
Why don't you provide the relevant/requested data instead of ceaselessly and baselessly continuing to label others trolls? Reminder: others are not trolls simply because you think that they are or because you state that they are hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I simply asked for some data lol (big sin for some reason here)
I have provided you with plenty factual data points, you simply continue to remain in your corner silently conceding rather than attempt to counter them hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I also simply asked you for data in the form of responses to my factual statements & answers to my simple questions (big sin for some reason here hehe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]) but you continue to remain in your corner silently conceding rather than provide hard data (or any reply at all hehe) as is clearly visible in the post history. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The post history is there for anybody who thinks this is wrong.
Correct hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
People just got angry when I ask them to provide data, which is the usual problem in this thread.
What evidence do you have to support this claim? You do not know how other posters feel, regardless of what their posts may cause you to think you know. You can post whatever you want and feel however you want about it, it will not change this fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Their claim was a charmed pet is going to massively out-DPS a Warrior, and that my data was simply wrong because the mob I was fighting was lower level.
What they ACTUALLY claimed is visible in this thread's post history and is viewable by all hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have shown data


All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
as the data shows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.
How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?
Last edited by cyxthryth; 08-31-2022 at 03:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2022, 04:25 PM
Kich867 Kich867 is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know people think I argued that, since I simply asked for some data lol (big sin for some reason here). The post history is there for anybody who thinks this is wrong.
I was addressing this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
If you think a Warrior at level 24 is going to lose a large chunk of DPS by fighting a level 22 mob, just show the parse. I can tell you they won't [...]
In response to your initial parse against a mob ~8 levels lower than you.

My point is that you do, even at that level, lose a pretty noticeable amount of DPS. Maybe not if you're as geared as your character is, perhaps having enough Strength offsets it, but I don't think a single parse demonstrates that well enough.

The difference between being 3, 4, or 5 levels above a mob is pretty substantial. Being consistently 5 levels above this mob my average TTK was ~70s, being somewhere between 3-5 levels above this mob my average TTK was ~85s, and if I were to filter it to the ones I can confirm are 3 levels below me the TTK is much closer to ~100s.

The amount of times I miss a mob 3 levels below me compared to a mob 5 levels below me is significantly higher when it's 3 levels below me. And the amount of times I hit is significantly higher, indicating that I'm hitting for far less on average against these mobs because I'm not high rolling them as often.

I think it's misleading to suggest that you don't lose much DPS fighting things only a few levels below you, especially since you can have some seriously swingy fights--some of my parses involve lucky strings of crits that are counterbalanced by unlucky fights where I miss a lot over the course of 100 or so parses. In your own parse you did substantially more DPS against a higher level enemy than you did against a low level enemy, which to me would suggest thats an outlier.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2022, 04:32 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I was addressing this:



In response to your initial parse against a mob ~8 levels lower than you.

My point is that you do, even at that level, lose a pretty noticeable amount of DPS. Maybe not if you're as geared as your character is, perhaps having enough Strength offsets it, but I don't think a single parse demonstrates that well enough.

The difference between being 3, 4, or 5 levels above a mob is pretty substantial. Being consistently 5 levels above this mob my average TTK was ~70s, being somewhere between 3-5 levels above this mob my average TTK was ~85s, and if I were to filter it to the ones I can confirm are 3 levels below me the TTK is much closer to ~100s.

The amount of times I miss a mob 3 levels below me compared to a mob 5 levels below me is significantly higher when it's 3 levels below me. And the amount of times I hit is significantly higher, indicating that I'm hitting for far less on average against these mobs because I'm not high rolling them as often.

I think it's misleading to suggest that you don't lose much DPS fighting things only a few levels below you, especially since you can have some seriously swingy fights--some of my parses involve lucky strings of crits that are counterbalanced by unlucky fights where I miss a lot over the course of 100 or so parses. In your own parse you did substantially more DPS against a higher level enemy than you did against a low level enemy, which to me would suggest thats an outlier.
I have shown that I didn't lose a large amount of DPS, and not enough to be below the charmed pet, which was the point. Even if the average shakes out to something closer to 19 DPS, that doesn't mean the charmed pet has some sort of heavy advantage.

I 100% agree more data would be better to get the true averages, but the same argument can be made for the pet DPS. It will have highs and lows too.

I am just giving out some quick data that I acquired to disprove obviously silly claims like a low level charmed pet is going to "massively" out-DPS a low level Warrior. If the warrior has low gear like yourself, this may be true. But the reality is most people can afford some minor twink gear (2k is a small sum of money), so I think it is not reasonable to make this assumption unless the thread is specifically talking about making a "self-found only" group.

The reality is I have given out way more data than all of the opposition combined, and it's never enough. They will not believe hours of parse data or a single parse hehe. It's much easier to just say "I am right because other people agree with me".
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-31-2022 at 04:37 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.