Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Is variance still needed?
Yes, it promotes "competition" 75 29.18%
No, its an unneccesary non-classic time sink 182 70.82%
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2013, 10:47 AM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gotrocks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you have a +/- 120 hr variance on each mob you may actually solve the problem.
Let's assume that it is possible to kill socking and tracking with sufficiently large variance.

Ok. So now socking and tracking are dead. How do guilds get bosses now? That's right. They zerg even harder than ever before, to give themselves the best odds of having a ranger/druid/bard in the right zone at the right time to notice on track that a boss popped and to be able to hit more targets at once during the repop every week.


A known, weekly repop with the same timers but lessened variance will not eliminate socking or tracking or zerging, but it will drastically increase the amount of raid mobs available to kill every week, with a large number of those mobs being impossible to monopolize by a guild that can "only" field 75 raiders at once. Big and "dedicated" guilds get more loot, but the smaller and casual guilds get some loot... assuming they don't insist on trying to fight for a VS/trak kill or something.

And then if only the training bullshit in VP were outlawed and VP repops with the rest of the mobs, suddenly the top dogs don't just have the no-brainer of "duh, let's kill trak and VS then go after ct/inny while a couple of our members train anyone who gets past the splits in VP" and they might have to settle for fewer targets outside of VP while they make sure they don't lose any PDs or something.


/shrug
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 02-02-2013 at 10:54 AM..
  #2  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:20 PM
SupaflyIRL SupaflyIRL is offline
Sarnak

SupaflyIRL's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 412
Default

Any solution that involves GM enforcement or spawn windows with known end points will be a failure because there is little to no GM presence on this server due to the volunteer nature of the staff, and the lengths people have shown they will go to for loot.

People are unwilling to compromise so behavior changes must be engineered through code changes.
__________________
||Spaceman Supafly - [59] Iksar Necromancer
||Cosmonaut Bryzgalov - [54] Barbarian Rogue
||Live: Senadaen/Shuriko/Devitec [Silent Resurgence - Innoruuk]
  #3  
Old 02-02-2013, 02:02 PM
Itap Itap is offline
Planar Protector

Itap's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Permafrost
Posts: 1,953
Default

The only thing we can both agree on then is we are both making assumptions that we cannot prove [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Lootenant Dan <Hierophant>
  #4  
Old 02-02-2013, 02:04 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,236
Default

Again Tecmos, I'm not saying EVERY player in TMO has THREE accounts with FULL RESIST GEAR and RIGHT NOW. I'm saying many players in TMO have some of those conditions, and if simultaneous repops became a reality, getting those accounts would become a priority.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #5  
Old 02-02-2013, 06:57 PM
AexDestroy AexDestroy is offline
Sarnak

AexDestroy's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sexy Town
Posts: 486
Default

To me it sounds like you want to do this.


Current Socks:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Proposed Socks:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Extending spawn time just seems to extend sock time?
People are just gonna fuckin sock.
__________________
  #6  
Old 02-03-2013, 03:26 PM
Frieza_Prexus Frieza_Prexus is offline
Fire Giant

Frieza_Prexus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 750
Default

So, I just got back in from being out all weekend.

@ Loraen, I agree completely that the other raid changes are far, far, more valuable, and that if they are a within our grasp that they should be the focus. Nilbog's comments seem to give us hope here, so let's play that out.

That said, if the other changes appeared nonviable, I figured my proposed scheme might be "less offensive" to the dev's sensibilities are it is a modification / fine tuning of the variance.

@ A few select individuals who took the time to explain themselves: I humbly accept the reminder that socking, while not fun, is a tactic of last resort for the smaller guild with no other option. Being in TMO, I can tend to forget that if a small guild absolutely wants a kill, the sock is always an option. I treated socking as an annoyance, whereas for some, it can be a necessity. I suppose hindsight is 20/20 on this one, and I do recognize that my suggestion does favor the larger guilds.

Also, regarding everyone in TMO having a level 60 alt: Most alts are perma camped in Trak lair 90% of the time. Some, like me, have no true alts and we have to haul ours butts everywhere. I keep Xasten at Trak ledge most of the time because we have so few enchanter alts, and I'll log on Elethia's wizard for things like Draco and such. There are a few who have completely pimped out alt armies, but they are relatively the exception.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6
Last edited by Frieza_Prexus; 02-03-2013 at 03:28 PM..
  #7  
Old 02-01-2013, 08:01 PM
August August is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 703
Default

I heard of this thing called 'instancing' I really think P99 should try it out. 100% Classic.
  #8  
Old 02-01-2013, 08:49 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I heard of this thing called 'instancing' I really think P99 should try it out. 100% Classic.
I'm down once we get to LDON. It was LDON right?
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #9  
Old 02-01-2013, 08:51 PM
fullmetalcoxman fullmetalcoxman is offline
Sarnak

fullmetalcoxman's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm down once we get to LDON. It was LDON right?
Yep, LDON. Since we are so classic and all, what expansion did variances get put in?
  #10  
Old 02-03-2013, 03:56 PM
Slave Slave is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,339
Default

I think it is time this policy was reviewed in full. It has done nothing to promote end-game raiding. In fact, it has stifled it to the point that when groups of joinees reach the raid scene, they quit in droves. Something needs to be done.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.