DPS: Monk vs. Warrior vs. Rogue vs. Ranger

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There never was an actual debate here buddy. You said any class can tank AoW with enough clerics. Multiple people told you were wrong. You doubled down. We all laughed.

Stop sperging up this thread.

You are the one "sperging" the thread. Troxx continues to refuse to admit he was wrong about Knight/Warrior agro, he cannot supply any examples of posts to back up his accusations against me, and he has admitted he is a troll. He also acknowledges other trolls exist.

I admitted I was wrong, and the only people who cannot move on from this are desparate trolls like yourself. Just take a look at your signature. If you want to lie and rant about other posters, keep it to RnF please.

Nobody cares about your troll posts and attempts derail threads. This is another Troxx and friends thread unfortunately. If you don't attack other posters, they don't need to defend themselves. Learn some self control.

[Troxx]

Flailing again are we?

Tsk tsk

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Flailing again are we?

Tsk tsk

Not at all. You still have three points you are purposely dodging, and everybody can see your cowardice:

1. You are an admitted troll, and you agree other trolls exist. This ruins multiple nonsensical lies you keep spouting.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=114

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look guys, I’m an honest fella. I will readily admit to having engaged in trolling behavior with regards to DSM. You all have functioning brain cells … so I know that you all already know this. I also know that many of you also have done this. I’m not apologetic in the slightest sense of the word either.

2. You still cannot find any posts that I have made which support your accusations against me.

3. You were wrong about Knight/Warrior agro, which you still haven't admitted to. This shows you are the one unable to admit you are wrong, while also showing you don't know everything. It's ok that you don't know everything, you do not have to project your inability about admitting you are wrong on to other posters.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=546

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have a NTOV 60 paladin and a 60 Frostreaver warrior.

The paladin and warrior can both solo easy shit. They both lock aggro equally well.

Ideally you stop spamming this thread, but you've lost the debate thus far regarding your lies about me.

When you are backed into a corner like this, you always end up deflecting and running away.

[Croco]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When you are backed into a corner like this, you always end up deflecting and running away.

Better than what you do. Constantly post and recheck every thread and make sure you get the last post and flood every thread with so many posts that they become completely unusable.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Croco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Better than what you do. Constantly post and recheck every thread and make sure you get the last post and flood every thread with so many posts that they become completely unusable.

You don't understand the basic concept of how cause and effect works it seems.

If trolls like yourself do not attack other posters, then said posters do not need to defend themselves.

I never start this, you can check all of the Troxx and friends threads.

If you don't want thread bloat, then don't troll. Talk you your fellow trolls and tell them not to troll too.

You do not have the right to troll and spread lies in random threads with impunity. I am sorry you are fragile enough to think so.

You've been banned before, and multiple posts you have made that I have responded to in the past were deleted. Reflect on your own behavior before talking about others.

[Croco]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bloat

[Toxigen]

sips coffee and smiles

[Troxx]

#popcorn

[Snaggles]

I actually think DSM did a great job on the 2nd post of the thread. Granted, these are certainly best case scenarios (warrior zerking and not dying, avatar ranger BFG, etc) but shows a similar level of geared toons.

About a page later people clarified that generally it’s rogue > monk > warrior/ranger which more or less is accurate. As warriors need to be using non-tank weapons and forfeiting a defensive disc timer it is rare they pop into the lead on a parse outside damage shield dps. It’s even more rare to be zerking. 120+ dps, on the edge of blood aggro, no way to dump thread…roll the dice.

While there are a lot of BFG’s still in use it’s another edge-case. Legacy weapon, needing 8dmg arrows to shine, suffer a 72 min CD which is generally saved to bump. A lot can happen in 72 mins on a quake so while I’ve burned mine gleefully on Vindi those 72 minutes after aren’t exactly comforting as you wait to reset it.

The monk vs rogue game is odd. Clearly a rogue has a leg-up in terms of ease to get to a solid level, 30k Epic MQ and you are a beast. Monks need a lot of help to close that gap. Usually there is peppered “but they can tank/solo/pull” added to disclaim the difference. Mend is nice for AoE fights and all that. In the end though one class is more purpose built than the rest because outside picking locks and a slick invis mechanic they are a single purpose tool and very efficient. If you are talking ONLY DPS the rest of the stuff while helping justify your choice is just a red herring.

The rest of this thread doesn’t need to keep going. The AoW thing could have been a quick retraction. This isn’t court, admitting you might be (or are) wrong is a quick solution to a problem. The rest of the pages are just a train wreck, nobody needs to keep this going and while some may be more or less to blame it’s a shared experience.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I actually think DSM did a great job on the 2nd post of the thread. Granted, these are certainly best case scenarios (warrior zerking and not dying, avatar ranger BFG, etc) but shows a similar level of geared toons.

About a page later people clarified that generally it’s rogue > monk > warrior/ranger which more or less is accurate. As warriors need to be using non-tank weapons and forfeiting a defensive disc timer it is rare they pop into the lead on a parse outside damage shield dps. It’s even more rare to be zerking. 120+ dps, on the edge of blood aggro, no way to dump thread…roll the dice.

While there are a lot of BFG’s still in use it’s another edge-case. Legacy weapon, needing 8dmg arrows to shine, suffer a 72 min CD which is generally saved to bump. A lot can happen in 72 mins on a quake so while I’ve burned mine gleefully on Vindi those 72 minutes after aren’t exactly comforting as you wait to reset it.

The monk vs rogue game is odd. Clearly a rogue has a leg-up in terms of ease to get to a solid level, 30k Epic MQ and you are a beast. Monks need a lot of help to close that gap. Usually there is peppered “but they can tank/solo/pull” added to disclaim the difference. Mend is nice for AoE fights and all that. In the end though one class is more purpose built than the rest because outside picking locks and a slick invis mechanic they are a single purpose tool and very efficient. If you are talking ONLY DPS the rest of the stuff while helping justify your choice is just a red herring.

The rest of this thread doesn’t need to keep going. The AoW thing could have been a quick retraction. This isn’t court, admitting you might be (or are) wrong is a quick solution to a problem. The rest of the pages are just a train wreck, nobody needs to keep this going and while some may be more or less to blame it’s a shared experience.

Agreed!