Request for a different policy on (game-changing) specific item camps

[soup]

Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you obviously is NOT reading...
I said you can make groups of WHATEVER you like - but its players who are tracked on the waiting list, not groups

also- read the 2nd big thing- its even better way

you obviously is not english master

I was trying not to be a dick about it, but hey, if you want to act like one, fine. You're doing a horrible job of articulating whatever it is you're trying to say, and what you do manage to say is ridiculous.

It's players that are tracked, not groups? What does that even mean? So if someone in my group leaves, I can replace them with any player I want? So in other words absolutely nothing changes from now?

Do you think the camp passing works with one full group of people leaving and another full group rolling in? lol? And even if it did, whatever the hell it is you're advocating would do nothing to change it.

[Kika Maslyaka]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you obviously is not english master

I was trying not to be a dick about it, but hey, if you want to act like one, fine. You're doing a horrible job of articulating whatever it is you're trying to say, and what you do manage to say is ridiculous.

It's players that are tracked, not groups? What does that even mean? So if someone in my group leaves, I can replace them with any player I want? So in other words absolutely nothing changes from now?

Do you think the camp passing works with one full group of people leaving and another full group rolling in? lol? And even if it did, whatever the hell it is you're advocating would do nothing to change it.

well you are the one not getting my point =P
mwatt understood it without need for step by step explanation =P
no, not trying to be a dick, but you keep asking again and again with questions which do not stick to what I am trying to say what so ever.

again
way 1:

players a, b and c form a group 1 and camping mob Z
player D shows up and wants in
group can either take him, OR put him 2nd in line
player E who is a guildy to a, b and c shows up and joins their group, BUT since D was there BEFORE him, E doesn't get rights to loot from mob Z, until D gets his



this still a bit confusing, so refer to WAY #2 described above - its much more clear

[mbledsoe]

Invite a wizard and magician to your group and kill the monster you need. Out gun them. shessh!

[mbledsoe]

There is an old adage that goes like this: MIGHT VS RIGHT. The mightier will prevail. This is how history is written.

TAKE THE CAMP!!!! Don't ask, just take it. Innoruk would want you to do this.

[yaaaflow]

So if some group is camping frenzy in lguk I (who could solo frenzy room if broken but prob not break the room myself) I can walk in, sit down on top of them and get every 2nd frenzy with your ruleset?

Yeah I don't see any potential for abuse there.

[Kika Maslyaka]

considering this is Classic server and all - per Official SOE rule- if ANYONE at all walks into your camp - you OBLIGATED to share, otherwise GM will simply kick you out [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

considering this is Classic server and all - per Official SOE rule- if ANYONE at all walks into your camp - you OBLIGATED to share, otherwise GM will simply kick you out [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This wasn't the rule on all servers. I know that such a rule was rarely if ever enforced on Rodcet Nife where I played.

[SirAlvarex]

I'm surprised (maybe more dissapointed..) there needs to be a set, complicated rule for camp disputes. What happened to the play nice policy? If someone comes by the camp and is willing to sit there until you are done, why not let them have the camp?

I agree the person who owns the camp has the right to decide who gets it next. It just puts a black mark on the community to see topics like these spring up. The broadcasts in game asking for fewer camp dispute petitions also don't help.

Can't we all just get along? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DoucLangur]

Originally Posted by SirAlvarex [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What happened to the play nice policy? If someone comes by the camp and is willing to sit there until you are done, why not let them have the camp?
[..]
Can't we all just get along? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This.

Originally Posted by mwatt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

EQ was designed to be a cooperative multiplayer game. In my opinion, this "locking down" goes contrary to that spirit. It's selfish and mean. Not "mean" like "cruel" - "mean" like "small and debased".

And this.

It's really as easy as that: If someone comes by, and you are in a camp that you can hold with anyone really, invite them into group, let them in line and camp the item together with them. Stop being selfish (or guild-selfish), it's just poor attitude.

[Kika Maslyaka]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This wasn't the rule on all servers. I know that such a rule was rarely if ever enforced on Rodcet Nife where I played.

it was universal PNP for the game - Play Nice Policy. Whenever certain server gms enforced it or not, is another thing