Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2011, 02:02 PM
Nedala Nedala is offline
Planar Protector

Nedala's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimthayner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
After wasting a good hour reading this thread, I've realized that neither side has offered ANY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE WHAT-SO-EVER to support their side. Neither side has offered me any proof other than idle speculation as to what may or may not happen if we allow/continue to disallow two-boxing.

The anti-two boxers are offereing a lot of theories and anecdotal evidence about how bad it would be (without offering any empirical proof), and the pro-two boxers are basically saying "it would be easier for me to play the game." Neither argument is valid for changing policy, or should even be considered by any group of people that have any amount of common sense or concept of objective decision making.


you want proof? check one of the servers where 2 box is allowed, and see how HORRIBLE that is.
  #2  
Old 02-26-2011, 03:11 PM
jimthayner jimthayner is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedala [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you want proof? check one of the servers where 2 box is allowed, and see how HORRIBLE that is.
I dislike two boxed servers, but horrible is a subjective term. Evidently, the people that two box on those servers like the two-boxing environment. Liking/disliking something isn't proof. Bottom line is that devs here banned it, with what seems to be a general consensus of the players being against allowing two boxing. That's fine. What it boils down to is a matter of personal preference. We're happy here disallowing it, and people are happy there allowing it. Good arrangement.
  #3  
Old 02-26-2011, 03:32 PM
Pico Pico is offline
Sarnak

Pico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimthayner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
After wasting a good hour reading this thread, I've realized that neither side has offered ANY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE WHAT-SO-EVER to support their side. Neither side has offered me any proof other than idle speculation as to what may or may not happen if we allow/continue to disallow two-boxing.

The anti-two boxers are offereing a lot of theories and anecdotal evidence about how bad it would be (without offering any empirical proof), and the pro-two boxers are basically saying "it would be easier for me to play the game." Neither argument is valid for changing policy, or should even be considered by any group of people that have any amount of common sense or concept of objective decision making.

The only coherent argument made so far is against allowing people to pay money to two box, since Sony probably would try to shut us down if we became a for-profit server.

Just for the record, this entire thread has made anyone who has read it dumber, and I think every single one of you is an idiot that can't quantify what they want and why. And people that can't quantify what they want, and back it up with arguments that use facts that were gathered scientifically, then this should be good enough for you:
Is this post a joke? Sure, let me find some peer-reviewed scientific articles on the effects boxing has on server populations for a 12 year old emulated game.

Anecdotal evidence is all anyone is going to have to go by here.
  #4  
Old 02-26-2011, 04:15 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Earlier in this thread I posited that allowing boxing would be really bad for the raid scene. Why did no one respond? Or does the pro-boxing population just not raid? (that's okay if they don't, but they have to consider the effect it would have still).
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #5  
Old 02-26-2011, 04:21 PM
Humerox Humerox is offline
Planar Protector

Humerox's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,665
Default

lol...i can see it now:

Winds of Change is recruiting!

You must have your main account and pocket cleric + chanter. (don't waste other people's time healing you and doing your CC) If you also have a pocket mage for CoTH apply immediately! Sam Deathwalker and 5 others run this 35 toon hardcore raid guild. So we only need 1!! more account!
__________________
Klaatu (RED)- Fastest Rez Click in Norrath
Klaatu (BLUE) - Eternal 51 Mage
Klattu (GREEN) - Baby Cleric

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken View Post
if your reason to be here is to ruin other peoples experiences and grief them off the server, then not only do you not deserve the privilege of playing here, but i will remove your ability to do so.
Last edited by Humerox; 02-26-2011 at 04:28 PM..
  #6  
Old 02-26-2011, 04:29 PM
loneless999 loneless999 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 268
Default

hated boxers on live hate them here

theres plenty of it going on on P1999 people requesting IP unlocks for the brothers friends goldfish who happens to live with them and really wants to play

i bet even people with legit reasons to have an IP unlocked have multi boxed at some point because they can
(my wifes at work ill login her toon to buff / port / PL my toon for a bit no one will notice)

1 toon = 1 person thats how i like it thats how i hope it stays
  #7  
Old 02-26-2011, 04:40 PM
maegi maegi is offline
Sarnak

maegi's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loneless999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
hated boxers on live hate them here

theres plenty of it going on on P1999 people requesting IP unlocks for the brothers friends goldfish who happens to live with them and really wants to play

i bet even people with legit reasons to have an IP unlocked have multi boxed at some point because they can
(my wifes at work ill login her toon to buff / port / PL my toon for a bit no one will notice)

1 toon = 1 person thats how i like it thats how i hope it stays
Sounds like a confession to me...
__________________
Malagar Dragon Order


Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Server runs much smoother without prima donnas prancing around being bitches like this is Walmart's Customer Service Department.
  #8  
Old 02-26-2011, 01:35 PM
toxiqwurm toxiqwurm is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 158
Default

good donations help keep the server running [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #9  
Old 02-26-2011, 04:17 PM
maegi maegi is offline
Sarnak

maegi's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 205
Default

It's against the server rules. Why is this even being discussed. Even if everyone in this thread said hell yeah let's 2 box, it's not going to happen. Therefore this thread is a waste of time.
__________________
Malagar Dragon Order


Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Server runs much smoother without prima donnas prancing around being bitches like this is Walmart's Customer Service Department.
  #10  
Old 02-26-2011, 04:55 PM
jimthayner jimthayner is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maegi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's against the server rules. Why is this even being discussed. Even if everyone in this thread said hell yeah let's 2 box, it's not going to happen. Therefore this thread is a waste of time.
THANK YOU
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.