Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:31 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,187
Default

Where does it say it was in effect during Velious? Not seeing it.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #2  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:33 PM
Runya Runya is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Link doesn't work for me....2005? You must've cried for a pansy rule like that during omens of war or some shit
  #3  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:33 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

http://www.elitegamerslounge.com/hom...?f=180&t=87498
Quote:
Kefyra wrote:
Alot of people have had questions about the Rallos Zek ruleset and also in regards to the SOE view of what part of each rule entails. Apparently, on each server, the gms have enforced each rule differently. I will break down the ruleset here and ask the questions that most people have had so that can make it more clear and if it's ok with Brenlo, Ashlanne and Kytharrea, repost it onto the other site for everyone to see. The following rules are the main ones that people interpret differently.

On Rallos Zek, PvP-related Play Nice Policy situations are expected to be resolved using PvP solutions. However, Non PvP-related Play Nice Policy issues, such as training, causing intentional experience loss, bind point, zone, and portal camping, as well as other various forms of harassment, are not permitted in the PvP environment.
The main question about this rule is mostly involving "causing intentional experience loss." After talking to various servers, it seems that gms have enforced this rule differently, the main difference being in regards to attacking people while they were engaging mobs. On Tallon Zek, the gms said it was ok to attack on mobs as long as you had a raid force large enough to kill the mob that you were attacking for. For example, say your enemy is engaged on Zum Muram in Ruined City of Dranik. You would not be allowed to send a group of sks to deathtouch clerics or what not ,because a group of sks could not foreseeably fight the mob alone so obviously there to make the raid wipe out intentionally, causing xp loss. However, if you brought your whole raid force to fight for the mob, you were obviously there to pvp and have every intention to fight with the intent of killing your enemy via pvp so therefore were not intentionally causing xp loss.
2004... going back 1 year at a time... it was absolutely in place during Rallos Zek's Velious
  #4  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:36 PM
Eslade Eslade is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Lab
Posts: 2,109
Default

Quote:
If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP
what if your raid strategy is to wait for the zerg to do a decent amount of the damage, wipe them out and then attempt to take the mob? I would consider that a reasonable chance.
__________________
Edalse Dwarf Cleric
Eslade Dwarf Paladin (Cazic Thule Server)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael View Post
WIPE IT CLEAN ITS TERRIBLE
#elfpals discord
  #5  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:38 PM
Runya Runya is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Never heard of the zones they speak of in the example
  #6  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:38 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,187
Default

zone and portal camping illegal?

plz enable, much bans.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #7  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:42 PM
Pikrib Pikrib is offline
Planar Protector

Pikrib's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
zone and portal camping illegal?

plz enable, much bans.
Need to ban Ragnaros again the guy sits at OT hammer spot and engages people before they have control of their characters. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #8  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:44 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikrib [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Need to ban Ragnaros again the guy sits at OT hammer spot and engages people before they have control of their characters. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually this would be something that was illegal under PnP, ya. I got a warning for portal camping on RZ... not even knowing it was a rule when it first came out. Nice to get a warning instead of a stacking suspension, u kno?


Quote:

1.
If raid X had yet to engage in the encounter, the raid should find a PvP solution
2. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP
3. If both raid X and Y engage simultaneously, they should find a PvP solution
4. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, raid X should find a PvP solution
5. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y by training, we will enforce the PnP
^ this is exactly what should be in place.

If Azrael wants to take 40 or so players and sit there baiting us to engage... fine. If 2 neckbeards wanna sit at character select and listen for a spy call to cause a wipe? Heh, ok. That will work both ways and result in a pretty shitty box.
  #9  
Old 05-12-2015, 04:23 PM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
zone and portal camping illegal?

plz enable, much bans.
Portal camping on Rallos was a given. Everybody knew you had to be ready for a fight when you zoned in. If this was in PnP, how come i was never aware of people getting banned over it, how come this happened all the time, especially at the trading hub, Gfay?

Gfay was the portal where this happened the most and alot, if you say this isnt the case, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
  #10  
Old 05-12-2015, 12:39 PM
Runya Runya is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Default

I love frags response about a blue gm.....was that gm you nirgs? Blue fgt
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.