Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:32 PM
ooantipostoo ooantipostoo is offline
Sarnak

ooantipostoo's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 348
Default

Just make it simple fat = 0 out of 10
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimm View Post
Its like someone gave a down syndrome child a handle of vodka and a keyboard.
  #2  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:32 PM
purist purist is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 561
Default

Why would my scale be fuckable only?
  #3  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:35 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why would my scale be fuckable only?
The overwhelming consensus so far is fuckable only. Exactly which you just said....

Quote:
Now, on to the scale system. This scale has no scientific medium such as it is left solely up to the observer. And therefore can not possibly be the same as your scale(you're observer A) unless you were exposed to the exact environments and ideas on beauty that observer B has had. Meaning there is no such thing as a universal theory of beauty and it is left purely up to the eye of the observ
Very good point, the girl i put in at 7/8 I would consider around a 7. But I know plenty of people who would consider her a 9.

Apparently purist is a male model.
  #4  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:38 PM
purist purist is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by President [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The overwhelming consensus so far is fuckable only. Exactly which you just said....
Wait.. I said that the scale is for fuckable chicks only?

When? Show me where, please.

The general consensus is that the minimum rating that most men would consider fucking is somewhere around a 4.

That's my position, and it corresponds to the general consensus. I have never stated anything else. You're either retarded, or confusing someone else's post with mine.
  #5  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:40 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wait.. I said that the scale is for fuckable chicks only?

When? Show me where, please.

The general consensus is that the minimum rating that most men would consider fucking is somewhere around a 4.

That's my position, and it corresponds to the general consensus. I have never stated anything else. You're either retarded, or confusing someone else's post with mine.
Jesus man. Go back and read the other posts on previous pages. You referred to the general consensus. There were 3 or so people stating you have to be fuckable to get into my 1-10, that, overall is the general consensus. Unless you are talking about the general consensus between you and your male modeling friends?
  #6  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:42 PM
purist purist is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 561
Default

k, two people on page 12 of a Project 99 forum thread are now ambassadors of the male gender, and account fully for the gender's general consensus.
  #7  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:44 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
k, two people on page 12 of a Project 99 forum thread are now ambassadors of the male gender, and account fully for the gender's general consensus.
I have never heard one single person in my life refer to "4" as being the number for fuckable on a scale of 1-10. Not one.

Not one in this post either.

So, how I am supposed to magically assume that is the "general consensus" and not think that you are referring to the consensus on this thread is beyond me.
  #8  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:44 PM
purist purist is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 561
Default

Hey, lets split hairs about me claiming the mantle of the general consensus for 5 more pages.
  #9  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:45 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey, lets split hairs about me claiming the mantle of the general consensus for 5 more pages.
I'm more interested in seeing a picture lineup of your scale. If for nothing more to pass time looking at hot girls while at work.
  #10  
Old 10-20-2010, 04:48 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,708
Default

Text is text.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



carry on!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.