Feminism today

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Formshifter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Goodness gracious me maybe it's idk.. GENETIC lol

Yes, it's genetic: it is in our DNA that men cannot wear dresses or lipstick (even though men wore dress-like garments in past eras), so that is why the babies pay attention when they do. Society and its gender expectations have NO impact whatsoever on infants or children.

I give up, you "win".

[Formshifter]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, it's genetic: it is in our DNA that men cannot wear dresses or lipstick (even though men wore dress-like garments in past eras), so that is why the babies pay attention when they do. Society and its gender expectations have NO impact whatsoever on infants or children.

I give up, you "win".

Or perhaps it's "hmm, that isn't what daddy normally wears. This is new to me. I should investigate." Not, "How obscene! This truly rubs my infant sensibilities the wrong way! Father musnt dress like a women should he wish to be respected by his peers!"

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you aware that genes are affected by environmental factors and early childhood experiences?

You need the word 'expression' in a key spot up above to not come off like a total retard here breh.

[maskedmelon]

Peeps, I hate to end the fun, but dominance, aggression and masculinity in general (for both sexes) are indeed genetic and are largely established via the level of androgen exposure in the second trimester of pregnancy. Google "digit ratio" get a good night's sleep and thank me later ^^

Look at your hand. The longer your ring finger is relative to your index finger, the more pronounced your masculinity is likely to be whether you are male or female, gay or straight, old or young. I cannot understand why any woman would want to be man-like though. They are hairy, sinewy, smelly, disgusting things (no offense guys).

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You need the word 'expression' in a key spot up above to not come off like a total retard here breh.

No I don't. Unfortunately for you, there is nothing that will prevent you from coming off like a total retard.

[Big_Japan]

lol, modern equivalent of phrenology is supposed to "end the fun"

[Formshifter]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No I don't. Unfortunately for you, there is nothing that will prevent you from coming off like a total retard.

Actually you do, sweetie pie.



Take some time to research "Genetic expression" before you try to use it in a debate.

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No I don't. Unfortunately for you, there is nothing that will prevent you from coming off like a total retard.

Okay then, I'll bite: your genetic makeup established at conception. 100%. Epigenetic factors influencing transcription come later. Shut the fuck up you are biologically illiterate.

[Formshifter]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Peeps, I hate to end the fun, but dominance, aggression and masculinity in general (for both sexes) are indeed genetic and are largely established via the level of androgen exposure in the second trimester of pregnancy.

From the mouths of babes no less!


Loramin is going to accuse you of being brainwashed by the patriarchy in 3...2...

[Formshifter]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay then, I'll bite: your genetic makeup established at conception. 100%. Epigenetic factors influencing transcription come later. Shut the fuck up you are biologically illiterate.

Tyrannosaurus rekt