Dear Atheist,

[Orruar]

Root, do you get at all concerned when you make about 20 posts and nobody responds to any of them? Does that not tip you off that what you're saying is of no interest to anyone at all?

[kylok]

r00t just stop, you're spouting old ass rhetoric that has generally proven to be false, if you want me to line by line it I will but you can use Google as well as the next ape.

[r00t]

Originally Posted by kylok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

r00t just stop, you're spouting old ass rhetoric that has generally proven to be false, if you want me to line by line it I will but you can use Google as well as the next ape.

quite on the contrary, there is more evidence that we are living in a computer simulation than there is evidence in the broken ass fossil record for evolution, yet you have no trouble believing everything spoonfed to you in school. Some of the more interesting parts of the theory are that quantum physicists have discovered particles use the same crc32 checksum ias nvented by a computer scientist in the 1960s. The speed of light being the maximum speed of the CPU. I could go on, but maybe you should try as your suggestion states and Google this very fascinating stuff.

[kylok]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

quite on the contrary, there is more evidence that we are living in a computer simulation than there is evidence in the broken ass fossil record for evolution, yet you have no trouble believing everything spoonfed to you in school. Some of the more interesting parts of the theory are that quantum physicists have discovered particles use the same crc32 checksum ias nvented by a computer scientist in the 1960s. The speed of light being the maximum speed of the CPU. I could go on, but maybe you should try as your suggestion states and Google this very fascinating stuff.

I would absolutely love to read this supposed evidence. Everything you just stated is correlation not causation. Coincidence =/= Divinity. The speed of light is the maximum speed of everything, from the prospective of a photon travel is instantaneous (try and reconcile that with human perspective). Quantum physics doesn't discover particles, particle physicists do that - and furthermore in the field of QM nothing is directly observed as it changes the results. Nice try and I didn't even have to google for that.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some of the more interesting parts of the theory are that quantum physicists have discovered particles use the same crc32 checksum ias nvented by a computer scientist in the 1960s. ... I could go on, but maybe you should try as your suggestion states and Google this very fascinating stuff.

So I took your advice and googled this. And apparently it's not quantum physics, but rather biologists that discovered checksum-like behavior in DNA. Is it really a leap of logic to think that natural evolution developed a technique for double checking the fidelity of copying that is somewhat similar to something people developed? I mean, there are certain problems in the physical world that both DNA and humans must overcome. Is it crazy to think we'd find similar solutions?

Finally, to take all that to the the logical conclusion that we're in a computer simulation somewhere is just... lol. You sound like Joe Rogan. You want to believe crazy shit so fucking bad that you'll take huge leaps of logic to get there. Have you looked into Scientology? Might be a good fit for you.

[r00t]

Besides the fact that people do, hence over 100 replies in this thread copy pasted off some christian website

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Besides the fact that people do, hence over 100 replies in this thread copy pasted off some christian website

Yeah, you're good at starting conversations. Not so good at seeing them through to completion.

[kylok]

Oh and it is absolutely possible to calculate the entropy of DNA - my O chem professor figured it out in 6 months, just waiting on publishing.

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by kylok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh and it is absolutely possible to calculate the entropy of DNA - my O chem professor figured it out in 6 months, just waiting on publishing.

I'll skip all of the assumptions you wrote about me, (Assumptions, wow, how scientific is that? Is that the scientific method you were lecturing me about?) and go straight to your problem. You, like so many arrogant college science students before you, think you have everything figured out, and that is laughable. Some of science's greatest minds believed they knew it all too. The earth was flat. Our solar system revolved around the Earth. Spontaneous generation. Blank slate theory. Cold fusion. Static Universe. The list is goes on and on. The things you think are proven fact now, will be as laughable as many we now look back on. Go on parroting the drivel you hear in school and wake up. You look childish. (kind of like that guy in the bar in Good Will Hunting)

[r00t]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll skip all of the assumptions you wrote about me, (Assumptions, wow, how scientific is that? Is that the scientific method you were lecturing me about?) and go straight to your problem. You, like so many arrogant college science students before you, think you have everything figured out, and that is laughable. Some of science's greatest minds believed they knew it all too. The earth was flat. Our solar system revolved around the Earth. Spontaneous generation. Blank slate theory. Cold fusion. Static Universe. The list is goes on and on. The things you think are proven fact now, will be as laughable as many we now look back on. Go on parroting the drivel you hear in school and wake up. You look childish. (kind of like that guy in the bar in Good Will Hunting)

This is why I believe macroevolution will one day be proven false. There is simply an enormous lack of evidence for it whatsoever.