The Fraud of Evolution Exposed

[moklianne]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wouldn't make sense because you're just pushing the goal post further back because then the origins of their existence would need to be explained.

For the human race's origins it makes complete sense. Where they came from could have been the same scenario or maybe they evolved. I believe evolution exists in the universe, but if there is sufficient evidence (as in physical evidence, not 'here's a book of stories') that creationism is where we came from, I could get behind that.

Something like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cha..._Generation%29

Look at all of the species we are experimenting with. It just makes sense that other, more evolved species would do the same and create life on purpose or by accident.

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

An important footnote is, that for some people, they like to live in their own private Summer of George, and believe in things unknown. To paraphrase Pascal, they believe because it is not proven.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Barkingturtle]

Fuck evolution.

I'm gonna be a cyborg.

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the fallacy of fine tuning is hilarious

you do realize that it could have been fine tuned any which way, and the fact that we're here isn't proof of anything except that this is the way it is...lol?

Proven false. If any of the cosmological constants were off by even .1%, life could not exist. Everything is unbelievably precise to allow for the existence and possibility of life.

[Rellapse35]

Can you guys just suck dicks already

[r00t]

It's true though. Things like the gravitational pull that keep atoms together, let alone solar systems and such, is perfectly fine tuned for order not chaos.

[Barkingturtle]

Order is an illusion. We are all on a one-way ride toward chaos.

[r00t]

The grand architectural design of the universe is why pretty much everyone familiar with higher math and science from Franklin to Einstein is/was a deist. Even Dawkins doesn't go full retard atheist, just religion bashes.

[r00t]

Don't get me wrong, Dawkins is a fuckin moran tho

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Those are agnostics.

Nah son. An atheist sees no need to acknowledge the existence of some "god force" without proof. Atheism is defined by its word. A-theist without belief. Belief of course is when someone holds something be true. This can be with or without evidence but in the terms of atheism it implies lack of evidence
Of course this is for true atheism.
There all kinds of pseudo-atheistic systems now. Alot, of people who claim to be atheist are actually anti-theist. The people who in essence proselytize to spread atheism aren't true atheists. Those people are simply seeking the groupthink and community that originally started religions.


An agnostic can't decide between truth/god claims. They basically are saying you cant know which god is correct or if god is correct at all. Agnostics can believe in a god force and just not know what to call it or how it would manifest "itself"