Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2013, 12:42 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is online now
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kassel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Alawen, Imo they are different. One has head smashing the other does not. in my eyes the key is head smashing and reasonable assertions of incoming death. Kids standing out side your house screaming IMO is not create a reasonable assertions of incoming death.
the differences are twofold.

the first major difference is the obligation to retreat. to begin, florida is a SYG state -- meaning zimmerman had no obligation to retreat, regardless of scenario. however, even despite this fact, zimmerman claims he was pinned to the ground, thus nullifying any potential requirement to retreat, regardless of state. he could not have retreated. new york is NOT a stand your ground state. white was not pinned to the ground. his ability to retreat was in no way hampered. thus, white could and should have attempted to retreat from the situation before exercising lethal force. this is really the beginning and end of the case, as this point overwhelms any self defense claim.

the second major difference is that zimmerman suffered physical harm to the extent that a reasonable person could have feared serious bodily harm or death if not for the use of lethal force. white suffered no such harm, and it would be difficult -- but not impossible -- to prove that white reasonably feared imminent, serious bodily harm or death on the basis of the threats the boys were making, prior to any actual violent action being taken. this half of the case is enough to kill self defense for the prosecution, but it could also be won by the defense. it is less concrete than the zimmerman case

and i would be remiss if i didn't mention that a huge difference in these cases was the element of reasonable doubt. this case had witnesses. the court knew, within reason, exactly what happened. the zimmerman case had none of that. it is very possible that if we had 3 witnesses with perfect views of the zimmerman-martin brawl, the outcome in this case could have been different. but we didn't. we don't even know beyond a reasonable doubt who was on top or who was screaming for help, let alone who initiated violence. the case is riddled with reasonable doubt, while the white case left zero room for doubt
  #2  
Old 07-14-2013, 01:49 PM
Alawen Alawen is offline
Kobold

Alawen's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Default

Please, drop more slurs to prove that other people are racist, racist.
  #3  
Old 07-14-2013, 01:53 PM
Vaildez Vaildez is offline
Kobold

Vaildez's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Location: The Salty Maid
Posts: 180
Default

This case should never have gone to trial in the first place.. This is what happens when the media goes race baiting to bring in big ratings.
  #4  
Old 07-14-2013, 01:55 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please, drop more slurs to prove that other people are racist, racist.
words don't make you racist. it's your reaction to those words (ERAGE) that makes you racist.
  #5  
Old 07-14-2013, 01:58 PM
Alawen Alawen is offline
Kobold

Alawen's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Default

Views, practices, and actions are what makes a racist a racist, including the action of deciding to use slurs and epithets.
  #6  
Old 07-14-2013, 02:15 PM
Vaildez Vaildez is offline
Kobold

Vaildez's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Location: The Salty Maid
Posts: 180
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 07-14-2013, 03:13 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is online now
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Default

^ all the more reason to be judicious in drawing comparisons to the horrors of historical and modern institutional racism.

it cheapens the accusation when misapplied to a correctly adjudicated case
  #8  
Old 07-14-2013, 03:15 PM
Malice_Mizer Malice_Mizer is offline
Aviak

Malice_Mizer's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
^ all the more reason to be judicious in drawing comparisons to the horrors of historical and modern institutional racism.

it cheapens the accusation when misapplied to a correctly adjudicated case
Spoken like a true greedy defender of your own power in this country.

Keep it up! I'm sure the next generation will have a fun time repenting for the ball you're currently dropping on that whole, "Let's have an honest and meaningful conversation about race" thing.
  #9  
Old 07-14-2013, 03:19 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is online now
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Spoken like a true greedy defender of your own power in this country.

Keep it up! I'm sure the next generation will have a fun time repenting for the ball you're currently dropping on that whole, "Let's have an honest and meaningful conversation about race" thing.
hmm, i haven't engaged in a conversation about race

i'm talking about a prominent trial that was recently and properly adjudicated in accordance with the law.

if you want to discuss how the correct verdict was inappropriate, you can go ahead with that
  #10  
Old 07-14-2013, 03:22 PM
Malice_Mizer Malice_Mizer is offline
Aviak

Malice_Mizer's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
^ all the more reason to be judicious in drawing comparisons to the horrors of historical and modern institutional racism.

it cheapens the accusation when misapplied to a correctly adjudicated case
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
hmm, i haven't engaged in a conversation about race

i'm talking about a prominent trial that was recently and properly adjudicated in accordance with the law.

if you want to discuss how the correct verdict was inappropriate, you can go ahead with that
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.