Drama

[Stepy]

"1. I am bound at king."
OK, I would guess you would be camping king for loot since you plan of doing the rinse and repeat method, rather for cash or guildies.

"3. I let the spawn re pop fully because I didn't expect the m2h to pop and wanted to leave them with some mobs to kill in case it didn't."

This is a little more interesting to me, either you were giving up the camp and wanted to make sure it was full pop so they would have to work for it. You prefer a challenge and wanted a full spawn so you could continue to rely on the charm and zone strat?
This particular statement of your leads me to believe you were planing on leaving and wanted it to be full spawn first and changed your mind when you saw named.
Having several boys this is a common practice when they have to share something they do not give up so willingly.

[Shewz]

Uhh, mobs at the king camp are fairly sparse in my experience. They were a full group, they had plenty of lull power, I figured they would want the xp and the entertainment of killing a full spawn. Sorry? Read the original deal.

[Skope]

Originally Posted by Stepy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"1. I am bound at king."
OK, I would guess you would be camping king for loot since you plan of doing the rinse and repeat method, rather for cash or guildies.

"3. I let the spawn re pop fully because I didn't expect the m2h to pop and wanted to leave them with some mobs to kill in case it didn't."

This is a little more interesting to me, either you were giving up the camp and wanted to make sure it was full pop so they would have to work for it. You prefer a challenge and wanted a full spawn so you could continue to rely on the charm and zone strat?
This particular statement of your leads me to believe you were planing on leaving and wanted it to be full spawn first and changed your mind when you saw named.
Having several boys this is a common practice when they have to share something they do not give up so willingly.

Yea, considering he had such a rough time he had to zone (or at least zone to make it easier) when you don't have to zone and then actually wait for the repops to then make it harder on himself? The whole thing is a mess, and i think it was a matter of both miscommunication and a misunderstanding from both parties, but w/e. These things happen all the time, it just so happens there's a mithril 2hander involved that sparked this debate.

Either way it's done, dude just got a 10k item from my guildie who would have been using it even though he lost a roll and proceeds to rant about how we have bad attitudes. Take your sword, sell it. Nobody cares

[Treats]

Originally Posted by Stepy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a little more interesting to me, either you were giving up the camp and wanted to make sure it was full pop so they would have to work for it. You prefer a challenge and wanted a full spawn so you could continue to rely on the charm and zone strat?
This particular statement of your leads me to believe you were planing on leaving and wanted it to be full spawn first and changed your mind when you saw named.
Having several boys this is a common practice when they have to share something they do not give up so willingly.

Just a simple case of greed on the part of the group. Obviously the group (and later the Guild Leadership of Divinity) knew they were doing something wrong (Camp rules or Ethics or whatever) if they let the Enchanter roll for the sword and then later gave it back to him. All was fine and dandy with the group waiting and letting all the frogs spawn until the King pops with the sword and they go into whore mode with "OMG WE HAVE TO HAVE THE LEWTZ ITS OUR CAMP NOW IF WE BREAK THE SPAWN"

To the above poster...Are you just a complete fucking idiot? Do you know of the spell "Pacify" or "Calm"? Yes he was planning on leaving because THATS THE FUCKING AGREEMENT HE MADE WITH THEM.

An Enchanter can kill King/PH/roamer in the room and nothing else then afk for 25 minutes until the next spawn. If an Enchanter binds near the zone out yes he can zone out and be back within 20 seconds depending on load times. I didn't think this was some super secret strategy but obviously some of you have no clue whatsoever or take the time to figure it out before you post your stupid comments.

[Daldolma]

That's fair, then -- maybe I take that knowledge for granted. I do have a few enchanter friends in-game, and I've heard them discuss it in Skype (and watched them do it in-game), so it's possible I have more than common knowledge regarding the subject. But to me it seems obvious that an enchanter solo'ing a difficult camp zones (or re-logs) to heal his charm. I think the dash to the zone line is overstated, as well -- the portal is about 8 steps away from the king's throne, and I wouldn't be surprised if the enchanter was bound in the king's safe hall. It's a common bind point for classes that can solo the King. It's entirely possible the whole zoning process took less than a minute, if he were bound at safe hall.

[Nocte]

There sure are a lot of assumptions made here about what my group was there to do and what everyone's intentions were. I'm glad I took screenshots of my group's chat and the few tells I sent to Shewz during our time down there. When I get home from work, and can post from somewhere other than my Blackberry, I may post everything leading up to me throwing my hands up in disgust and gating out of the situation before the king was dead.

I'm sure it won't matter, since the drama wagon is careering out of control, but maybe folks can assume less.

[Nocte]

I think you might be surprised.

[President]

Originally Posted by Nocte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think you might be surprised.

This in response to me Nocte? I am very interested to see what you have when you get home.

[Shewz]

Oh man Nocte is gonna crank this shit up to 11, I am so ridiculously excited.

[logiktrip]

What is the actual difference between a group who has to zone out to Uguk after killing 1 mob in king room versus an enchanter who has to do the same? I don't really care how an enchanter has to solo that particular camp, but if the Divinity group had told you 'no, we do one at a time like you do, enchanter buddy' would you have given up the camp?

My money is on no.