Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[PlsNoBan]

If this server keeps going another 20 years and fungi tunics cost 200pp is that no longer a twink item? Doesn't improve your characters power significantly cause its cheap?

I feel like I'm talking to a toddler

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If this server keeps going another 20 years and fungi tunics cost 200pp is that no longer a twink item? Doesn't improve your characters power significantly cause its cheap?

I feel like I'm talking to a toddler

Yes. If Fungi Tunic is 200pp, everybody would have one. At that point you can't really remove it from the equation, unless the topic is specifically "best group assuming we don't buy any items and self farm". That isn't the topic, and never has been.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the topic

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[PlsNoBan]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

The only silliness is from you PlsNoBan. To try and win a single point, you are now trying to claim this topic has been about self-find only groups lol.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only silliness is from you PlsNoBan

Then why have you called me silly multiple times in multiple threads (including this one) in which all I did was state truthful facts and ask simple questions?

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only silliness is from you PlsNoBan. To try and win a single point, you are now trying to claim this topic has been about self-find only groups lol.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gloomlord]

I mean, it's so damn simple to figure out. If 2 enchanters and 1 cleric are chainsawing through mobs with 2 charms, then how does a shaman casting dots, which won't even reach full duration, on the mobs being killed mean anything? CH also completely outdoes Torpor here, so that's not an argument either.

Why has DSM decided to be one of the most childish people I've ever seen on a forum and debate otherwise when even a person with average skill can see this is wrong?

Threads this long should be about some interesting topic -- not some idiot unable to admit the truth.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean, it's so damn simple to figure out. If 2 enchanters and 1 cleric are chainsawing through mobs with 2 charms, then how does a shaman casting dots, which won't even reach full duration, on the mobs being killed mean anything? CH also completely outdoes Torpor here, so that's not an argument either.

Why has DSM decided to be one of the most childish people I've ever seen on a forum and debate otherwise when even a person with average skill can see this is wrong?

Threads this long should be about some interesting topic -- not some idiot unable to admit the truth.

The only childish people here are the trolls, like yourself. I post evidence and debate with logic. If it's such an obvious thing to prove, why haven't you or someone else posted data? It should be trivial to prove me wrong.

The answer is simple, the trolls probably know they will get the same data. The math isn't hard hehe. But since they are too childish to admit they are wrong, they continue to troll. Its easier, and they can try to save face.

You are not even reading my arguments correctly. Where am I DoTing mobs that are dying in 30 seconds due to Enchanter pets? https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

data

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?