******Official politics thread ******

[skarlorn]

rly though

that's some bean-level thinkin.

How about the labor of logistics? Supplying raw materials to the trained workers who can then do their thing. What about the person who trained probably studied for years then innovated a new idea for turning raw materials into something cool? then there's the person who oversees the implementation of all aspects of this endeavor and manages hundreds of people all of whom have their own problems and bring it to their leader. there's the people who su C C the hard workers and bring them joy in life. are they only entitled to cum?

[maskedmelon]

which is more deplorable, few exploiting many or many exploiting few?

[mickmoranis]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oved-guns.html

no common sense gun law would have stopped a single school shooting in american history, infact the assault weapons ban was in place when columbine happened.

The truth is, that the police could have done something, but chose not to.

What we can do to solve mass shootings is create an incentive for law enforcement to thoroughly investigate when there are reported threats of a potential mass shooting.

If a parent of a mass shooter went to the police and asked for help, but got none, the gun didnt kill people, the system did.

The same system you assume will keep guns out of the hands of the wrong people if we just "make laws" so they cant buy large magazines or guns with handles on them. :eyeroll:

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

which is more deplorable, few exploiting many or many exploiting few?

woke bomb

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i disagree.

people would not know what to make without smart people giving them guidance :-)

god bless u silly bean

thinking is a type of labor, smart guy

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thinking is a type of labor, smart guy

which would explain why libcuck mellenials dont do it.

[skarlorn]

i do agree that some of the greedlords could ease up a lil on making money and spread the wealth.

*SHRUG*

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rly though

that's some bean-level thinkin.

How about the labor of logistics? Supplying raw materials to the trained workers who can then do their thing. What about the person who trained probably studied for years then innovated a new idea for turning raw materials into something cool? then there's the person who oversees the implementation of all aspects of this endeavor and manages hundreds of people all of whom have their own problems and bring it to their leader. there's the people who su C C the hard workers and bring them joy in life. are they only entitled to cum?

The problem I have with intellectual property is it rarely stays with the people that did the inventing. The patient or is stolen, the patient is sold soon after its worth any money. Essentially this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cvq3Pf3j61c

Then there is the corrosive effect of patients...No one tells people the shit the learn because everyone is far too busy competing for money all the time. So our heads our working against each other than with each other to invent anything....including medicine.

Usually inventors aren't people sitting around thinking "how can I get rich"...it just not the same personality type.

founder2-1.jpg

This guy never invented anything. He stole it from those two ambiguous gay partners that created the best burger shop around.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oved-guns.html

no common sense gun law would have stopped a single school shooting in american history, infact the assault weapons ban was in place when columbine happened.

The truth is, that the police could have done something, but chose not to.

What we can do to solve mass shootings is create an incentive for law enforcement to thoroughly investigate when there are reported threats of a potential mass shooting.

If a parent of a mass shooter went to the police and asked for help, but got none, the gun didnt kill people, the system did.

The same system you assume will keep guns out of the hands of the wrong people if we just "make laws" so they cant buy large magazines or guns with handles on them. :eyeroll:

Now, Mick, you can't have law enforcement openly acting like the Stasi in an open society.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Attachment 9723

This guy never invented anything. He stole it from those two ambiguous gay partners that created the best burger shop around.

no:

1. those two guys tried to franchise
2. failed
3. this guy came in and said he could franchise it
4. he succeeded

ONE guy came up with a fast way to cook a hamburger.... the other guy came up with a way to franchise a resteraunt all over the planet.

The guy that figured out how to turn a burger stand into a billion dollar corporation DESERVES TO OWN the corporation.