Banned toxic players cry about server staff. Silent majority thanks GMs

[Snortles Chortles]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Nirgon]

Now that we cleared that up I do have another question.

They use this term "people of color" in the HR trainings. You know that is linguistically the same as "colored people", while I do personally find the abbreviated "coloreds" derogatory. How is "POC" not a slur by these standards?

[xdrcfrx]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Now that we cleared that up I do have another question.

They use this term "people of color" in the HR trainings. You know that is linguistically the same as "colored people", while I do personally find the abbreviated "coloreds" derogatory. How is "POC" not a slur by these standards?

I would suppose is that "colored people" places the racial status of the person/people in question as above their status as people by referencing it first, whereas "people of color" considers them first as people, before any reference to race or ethnicity.

[Nirgon]

People who are red and red people are linguistically the same. The word color or colored is not different linguistically.

[xdrcfrx]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People who are red and red people are linguistically the same. The word color or colored is not different linguistically.

tbh I don't have a huge dog in the nomenclature fight. The other answer is "because that's what is collectively considered polite now," and generally being polite is considered "good."

Lets get back to discussing how you degens think Pinochet and other murderous despots did nothing wrong, so long as it was in the service of the pursuit of profit. Of course the ends justify the means.

[Nirgon]

So it's made up rules like I suspected. You "think" it is because it was propagandized as "politically correct" yet is linguistically the same. Not even an eyelash is batted, this thought doesn't occur, and the phrase is blindly repeated as new speak even though it's the same thing. This shit is truly Orwellian if you're higher up on the IQ curve and realize it. I might be barely there, enough to realize it.


As far as the fucking helicopters thing man this isn't South America. Worse things still happen to people including real actual slavery in Libya. Where's BLM on that shit? Why does no one know this?

Oh just like the above, they are programmed by this controlled narrative and don't think or research for themselves. It is really cringe. Guess who produces said narrative? People who pay lots of money on studies to figure out what can influence people like the cucks in here, and what makes them tick.

[imperiouskitten]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So it's made up rules like I suspected. You "think" it is because it was propagandized as "politically correct" yet is linguistically the same. Not even an eyelash is batted, this thought doesn't occur, and the phrase is blindly repeated as new speak even though it's the same thing. This shit is truly Orwellian if you're higher up on the IQ curve and realize it. I might be barely there, enough to realize it.


As far as the fucking helicopters thing man this isn't South America. Worse things still happen to people including real actual slavery in Libya. Where's BLM on that shit? Why does no one know this?

Oh just like the above, they are programmed by this controlled narrative and don't think or research for themselves. It is really cringe. Guess who produces said narrative? People who pay lots of money on studies to figure out what can influence people like the cucks in here, and what makes them tick.

and guess who generates the reactionary consensus you strictly abide? teh very same moneyed interests.

get woke mein youtube radical.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So it's made up rules like I suspected. You "think" it is because it was propagandized as "politically correct" yet is linguistically the same. Not even an eyelash is batted, this thought doesn't occur, and the phrase is blindly repeated as new speak even though it's the same thing. This shit is truly Orwellian if you're higher up on the IQ curve and realize it. I might be barely there, enough to realize it.


As far as the fucking helicopters thing man this isn't South America. Worse things still happen to people including real actual slavery in Libya. Where's BLM on that shit? Why does no one know this?

Oh just like the above, they are programmed by this controlled narrative and don't think or research for themselves. It is really cringe. Guess who produces said narrative? People who pay lots of money on studies to figure out what can influence people like the cucks in here, and what makes them tick.

all culture and norms are made up. being a good person to others is generally recommended in all cultures.

[Horza]

There's actual slavery in Libya, so there's nothing wrong with threatening to murder people who disagree with you.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's actual slavery in Libya, so there's nothing wrong with threatening to murder people who disagree with you.

Where did I say that was ok.

The donations to free Kyle Rittenhouse is self defense. I think it's justified there.

The guy who shot Chris Kyle is a murderer.

The grey area I hate to admit ain't bein discussed with disingenuous, closed minded people with an agenda. It's not helicopter shit.