America Vs China

[Ronas]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...#disqus_thread

[moklianne]

Originally Posted by Salty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Fr...search_Program

Russia and China both have something similar to HAARP. I'd go with the US, but I don't want to think how bad that war would be. Even without nukes.

[philbertpk]

They wont do it. China would rather wait the US out until they can come in and take over economically OR until we welcome them as our saviors after the power gets cut off.

They wont fight a war.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My point stands. Discounting the PLAAF is a fool's errand.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Beastro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still in prototype and won't be in service for more than a decade, the mainstay will remain Sukhoi ripoffs just like the US will remain tied to the F-15,-16 and -18.

Rofl dude. That picture *IS* a Sukhoi. T-50.

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You want us to think that you're smart, huh?

[bman8810]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rofl dude. That picture *IS* a Sukhoi. T-50.

That is a picture of a prototype.

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rofl dude. That picture *IS* a Sukhoi. T-50.

And hence why I should never pull all nighters ever again.

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by Ronas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...#disqus_thread

ASATs are a minor leap from ABMs. The US has been tinkering with them since the 50s, though without the success the ABMs had.