Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Important > News & Announcements > Polls

View Poll Results: What is your opinion of the No Boxing Rule?
I think its important to this server's health, and should stay. 220 74.58%
I think it should be removed. 58 19.66%
It wouldn't affect me either way. 17 5.76%
Voters: 295. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2010, 01:24 PM
Trimm Trimm is offline
Sarnak

Trimm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 468
Send a message via AIM to Trimm
Default

It's even more discouraging being a rogue and not being able to solo *anything*, but I knew that before I made my character and don't regret a thing. This server is doing just fine without boxing.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
__________________
Trimm Rockgroin 59 Rogue
Trimman Vintersorg 52 Shaman

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Cats on the moon not happening on my watch.
  #2  
Old 02-09-2010, 04:51 PM
Anuril Anuril is offline
Kobold

Anuril's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 101
Default

I propose that the Devs release a list of all characters/accounts granted an IP exemption. This would be for transparency's sake ya know.
  #3  
Old 02-10-2010, 02:15 AM
bastyr bastyr is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 28
Default

I used to box all the time using other peoples toons and eventually my own second account. I would two box to add a 7th to a group for whatever - dps / healing. If i was lvling up I would have the same approach, if I couldn't get a group I would go to a camp w/both chars, and camp the bot once the group was full.

I guess I did this for the fun factor of playing two characters and because of timezone issues... try playing 1 character on one VZ or SZ during aussie times, not a soul was about.

I was dissapointed to discover the no boxing rule and I hope it gets lifted.
  #4  
Old 02-10-2010, 12:46 PM
Packet Packet is offline
Kobold

Packet's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 102
Default

It's unanimous and I doubt our opinions matter when there are a good 150 votes over. The only thing that likely matters to the staff is the poll number and opposing at this point is useless considering they'd lose less if the 2boxing supporters quit for that reason. If I were you guys (supporters of 2boxing), I'd try to argue at the angle of increasing full group xp. I support 2 boxing but I know when I've lost. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Last edited by Packet; 02-10-2010 at 01:02 PM..
  #5  
Old 02-10-2010, 02:42 PM
L2Phantom L2Phantom is offline
Kobold

L2Phantom's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 165
Default

I completely disagree with 2 boxing, but I'd still be in support of increasing group experience. Too many people just choose to solo if they are able to, you should always consider grouping no matter your class for better experience if you so choose.
  #6  
Old 02-10-2010, 03:09 PM
The Situation The Situation is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 171
Default

How about decreasing solo experience? Would you be in favor of that?
  #7  
Old 02-10-2010, 03:42 PM
Shads Shads is offline
Aviak

Shads's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Situation [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about decreasing solo experience? Would you be in favor of that?
LOL I would be yes but most would argue that if you weren't able to find a group blah blah blah...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
God damnit why don't these gay forums allow posts with all caps. Where do I turn that shit off
  #8  
Old 02-11-2010, 10:33 AM
Kelven Kelven is offline
Kobold

Kelven's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 137
Default

This is an odd poll because of the current level spread on the server. Newbies would probably be in favor of boxing as it is sometimes a pain to find a group, while 50's or 50's with twinks could care less.

I voted "wouldn't effect me either way" because honestly it wouldn't.
__________________
60sk Kelven -<Divinity>
60nec Armano
57enc Oceanlab
  #9  
Old 02-17-2010, 01:58 PM
Recyclebin Recyclebin is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelven [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is an odd poll because of the current level spread on the server. Newbies would probably be in favor of boxing as it is sometimes a pain to find a group, while 50's or 50's with twinks could care less.

I voted "wouldn't effect me either way" because honestly it wouldn't.
This is so true. With how badly item prices are inflated and a good handful of poop socking 50's they vote against boxing because *gasp* it doesn't affect them because they can twink out their characters with 10-20k worth of items, while the rest of us have characters that maybe have 500p worth of gear on them at level 10-20-30.
  #10  
Old 02-17-2010, 02:04 PM
Witness Witness is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recyclebin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is so true. With how badly item prices are inflated and a good handful of poop socking 50's they vote against boxing because *gasp* it doesn't affect them because they can twink out their characters with 10-20k worth of items, while the rest of us have characters that maybe have 500p worth of gear on them at level 10-20-30.
lol, 500pp of gear is amazing at level 10 and even level 20..my bard ran around in full bronze until level 40ish with no jewelry and FS weapons probably totaling around 300pp and he did just fine.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.