Not My President - The Unity Question

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about the national debt though?

imo we make China pay for it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
While Mexico pays for the wall.
What can we get the Canadans to pay for? eh all they have are hockey sticks anyhoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Maybe they can change their minds, open their border, take all our fleeing progressive liberals. Put them on farms and work 'em [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[AzzarTheGod]

Wow Daywolf too many words for me. Can you dumb that down any more? I got a lot of vaccines.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow Daywolf too many words for me. Can you dumb that down any more? I got a lot of vaccines.

I lankeded a video if it helps [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Swish]

If Texas secedes, does it forego it's share of the national debt? If so, they should do it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[renordw]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about the national debt though?

Nobody cares about the national debt, it's an accounting trick anyways

[AzzarTheGod]

imma beast on the mic

[Nilstoniakrath]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Or get rid of the illegal and fake votes and watch blue turn to near solid red. And blue by far doesn't have the corner on the market of social freedom. In fact it's highly repressive. It's not social freedom but social fairness. And that fairness being a construct of their own ideology; not real fairness, but of some backwards fairness doctrine that is everything but "fair".

Yes, social freedom is something the libtards should be in favor of, but they are too insecure in their ideology (and for good reason) so they instead support political correctness and want to crush free speech and freedom of association, and want to hang someone for not baking a homo wedding cake but think it is fine to fire someone for voting the wrong way (GrubHub @sshat CEO)

[Nilstoniakrath]

Originally Posted by Rader [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Unity sucks, let the blue states unite, and the red states unite, and let's see who succeeds and who fails. Probably a bunch of people end up living in a blue state for social freedom and work in a red state for economic freedom

Or just let state's rights rule... at least then we have a 1 in 50 chance of one state getting things somewhat right, instead of a singe federal government totally F-ing things up as usual

Too bad state's rights is associated with the Civil War and slavery, just because some dumb@$$ bigots were morons 150 years ago shouldn't dictate what we do today

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yea what are the arguments libs have against state rights anyway? one state turning itself into a tarpit and the other turning itself into a heavens gate christian community? Who gives a shit.

It's all about control. They want everyone to believe their ideals and enjoy their variety of freedom... at gun point.

That they might finally do away with that pesky "Judeo-Christian ethics" and any form of morality.

[R Flair]

Another liberal racism hoax exposed. Think this is like the 20th one ive seen exposed in the last 2 weeks alone.

http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fi...false-too.html