****OFFICAL**** Trump Hillary Debate 2016.09.26 Thread****

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Interesting poll numbers. I will definitely be pulling a torrent later and going over it. I didn't catch much because things heated up in the room, as I said, but the "excuse me" that I did catch wasn't Jeb-bashing quality, and that's what I meant.

Just wanted to clarify. Trump was tempered. The moderator was bashing him. If Hillary was bashed I didn't see it.

You will be in for a treat, cause there were a few of those moments where he spoke over and silenced both Hillary and Holt. Many funny videos will come of it.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You will be in for a treat, cause there were a few of those moments where he spoke over and silenced both Hillary and Holt. Many funny videos will come of it.

Well now I am not sure if I should be angry about the disruptions in the room because I actually missed something...lol.

Appreciate the tip off.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wa. Times: Trump 71%, Hillary 24%, Neither 4%, Lester Holt 2%

teh beast! ftw!

[R Flair]

The only way anyone could think Hillary won the debate is if they think racebaiting shit like "racist birther issue" or "that latino you called a housekeeper had a name" and a slew of other instances of liberal word-policing and shaming is actual a valid form of debate tactics.

News flash, normal people don't care about those empty, trivial insults. They do, however, care about Trumps insults which point to her being an actual criminal and an ineffective politician.

[Daywolf]

If you remember, they did the same thing to that weenie, Mitt Romney. Difference is, he backed down from the moderator where as the Don stood his ground.

[R Flair]

Next time the Don should say I guess the founding fathers were all racist for saying someone should be a citizen of the US to be president, cuz being black had nothing to do with why we asked for him to prove his citizenship.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only way anyone could think Hillary won the debate is if they think racebaiting shit like "racist birther issue" or "that latino you called a housekeeper had a name" and a slew of other instances of liberal word-policing and shaming is actual a valid form of debate tactics.

News flash, normal people don't care about those empty, trivial insults. They do, however, care about Trumps insults which point to her being an actual criminal and an ineffective politician.

I busted out laughing (among the angry ADHDs who were pretty fired up over her performance) along with 1 other guy.

Shit was fucking hilarious. That housekeeper stuff had us smiling hard. Still makes me grin a bit. Its so cheesy to try to go after something like that...yeesh...

[R Flair]

Her arguments were honestly nothing but a bunch of school yard name calling and grandstanding. "That latino woman is NOW A CITIZEN and you can bet come november SHE WILL VOTE!"

What a champion for the oppressed masses! She will provide safe spaces for all those afflicted by the evil boogeyman Trump.

Give me a fukin break.

[AzzarTheGod]

^ That's exactly the line right there. Got me n this 1 guy good.

[Baler]

I never remember the 'big debate' being such a fucking circus, except for the past few elections. Interruptions, name calling, Insinuations on false pretenses and even the moderator gets in on the act.

Am I remembering history wrong or has it gotten out of hand as time goes on? I want to blame the excessive availability of information now-a-days.