I'd take these guys more seriously

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the whole argument that these guys are nonviolent is fucking really ignorant.

Is there some sort of underground video being hidden away from the rest of us where there was any violence other than from the feds? In this whole thing, I've only seen violence from the feds... but the protesters are deemed violent? Just because...? Yes, I'm ignorant of this, you'll need to explain it to me in detail. Because this sounds deeply irrational to me. The guys doing all the shooting are peaceful while the ones being shot are violent. yeaaahhh.... no I'm still ignorant I guess.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is there some sort of underground video being hidden away from the rest of us where there was any violence other than from the feds? In this whole thing, I've only seen violence from the feds... but the protesters are deemed violent? Just because...? Yes, I'm ignorant of this, you'll need to explain it to me in detail. Because this sounds deeply irrational to me. The guys doing all the shooting are peaceful while the ones being shot are violent. yeaaahhh.... no I'm still ignorant I guess.

pull someone over, black & unarmed: Violent

Point guns out a window and threaten to use them if force is used against them: non violent

I seriously don't understand your fucking logic here.. oh wait there is none, your decision is based completely on deep, inescapable, very real racism

[maskedmelon]

When did I say it was ok to indiscriminately shoot black people? It's not, but criminals should expect to get shot if they flee police. That's the reason I don't have much sympathy for LaVoy.

We were talking about protests though (BLM Urban Riots vs Hillbilly Occupy BFE) I can't really debate you about the videos you reference though because I have neither seen nor heard of them.

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pull someone over, black & unarmed: Violent

Point guns out a window and threaten to use them if force is used against them: non violent

I seriously don't understand your fucking logic here.. oh wait there is none, your decision is based completely on deep, inescapable, very real racism

I know every piece of data you think you know is actually a cookie cutter regurgitated piece of television/reddit memetic programming, but every livestream of a BLM protest I've watched has had at least one protester shouting threats at police (with zero repercussions). We're talking leaning into a pig's face and screaming "you are going to die for what you did", "we are going to kill you", etc. while the cops stand there with their hands tied.

No consequences except the livestreamer usually walks away quickly from the scene so as not to damage the Soros narrative. The idea that large percentages of police are looking for any excuse to fly off the handle because of race is a total fabrication.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pull someone over, black & unarmed: Violent

Point guns out a window and threaten to use them if force is used against them: non violent

Well, I don't agree with the first statement. Maybe I am alone though.

Let's put your argument to the test. Who here has argued or would argue either of these things are true?

[Lurikeen]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pull someone over, black & unarmed: Violent

Point guns out a window and threaten to use them if force is used against them: non violent

You're joking right?

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, I don't agree with the first statement. Maybe I am alone though.

Let's put your argument to the test. Who here has argued or would argue either of these things are true?

I think the miscommunication comes from, if you are against the BLM movement you are against what they were upset about... what they are upset about are unarmed non-violent black people being assaulted and then shot by the police. (mean truthfully what they are upset about is what the yowlkedas are upset about, again whites and blacks, not different at all)

I think many of the people who condemn the BLM movement do so becuse they hate the message, not the "riots" or whatever that happens during their protests. (riots and stuff that are and have been started by white instigators or the police themselves, not just really mad, teens what have no parental guidance jobs or money)

lets be clear on one hand you have blacks who no mater what they say to the police, are resisting and being violent... you have protests by blacks, that no mater what they say or do, are riots...

there is a continued insistence that no matter what it is that's good that comes from a black group or person, it cannot outweigh the bad.

when the truth is whites in the exact same position, are given a huge benefit of the doubt.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Point guns out a window

You have pics? I'm looking high and low but not seeing anything....
Was that "at"? or 'at' them? or just that guns have a front and back end and always pointing somewhere? Pointing at themselves?

I assume you mean "at" since you said "and threaten to use them if force is used against them" which would imply that they were confronting someone directly, with guns drawn and pointed, and threatening to fire.

Still looking... searching.... hmmmm....

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think the miscommunication comes from, if you are against the BLM movement you are against what they were upset about... what they are upset about are unarmed non-violent black people being assaulted and then shot by the police. (mean truthfully what they are upset about is what the yowlkedas are upset about, again whites and blacks, not different at all)

I think many of the people who condemn the BLM movement do so becuse they hate the message, not the "riots" or whatever that happens during their protests. (riots and stuff that are and have been started by white instigators or the police themselves, not just really mad, teens what have no parental guidance jobs or money)

lets be clear on one hand you have blacks who no mater what they say to the police, are resisting and being violent... you have protests by blacks, that no mater what they say or do, are riots...

there is a continued insistence that no matter what it is that's good that comes from a black group or person, it cannot outweigh the bad.

when the truth is whites in the exact same position, are given a huge benefit of the doubt.

just want to be 100% clear i did not read this nor will i ever

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just want to be 100% clear i did not read this nor will i ever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3wlroM2gZ8