![]() |
|
#91
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#92
|
||||
|
Quote:
Have fun in a years time when certain guilds have level 52 alts in BIS NTOV gear to kill the 52 dragons with 3 people. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#93
|
||||
|
Quote:
FAT goes for AoW, CT, maybe soltanak, and maybe tormax. FA goes wherever Rampage can be found AT goes for VP Asgard has gone for 1 Gorenaire ever Long variance is good, earthquake only system is good. Short is not. If resources of the high level raiders are tied up in high priority targets all the time, other stuff will be open. Some people just don't want to dedicate the time to get stuff, and that is fine. Just don't expect to be rewarded with the best loot in the game either.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#94
|
|||
|
I still don't understand why no variance is bad.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#95
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#96
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#97
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#98
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#100
|
||||
|
Quote:
Doesn't this happen anyway? (CoTH ducking?) If a quarter of the server is tracking the target I'm going after, why wouldn't I take my guild to any of the other dozen targets that are going to spawn in the next 20 minutes. I am NOT arguing for variance to be taken out without an earthquake. I'm arguing for no variance + 1-2 earthquakes a month (one is enough, 2 if they're classic). Example: its 7pm and there is an earthquake. 5 targets die within the first 20 minutes. An additional 10 targets die in the next 20 minutes. And another 10 in the next 20 minutes. Fast forward to next week. Too many people going after the target you want? Pick a different target that isn't contested or try and race for it, and if you lose you can move on to one thats uncontested. The nice thing is that there are literally 24 other targets popping in the next 30 minutes that you can set up at. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|